This problem follows on from Keep It Simple and Egyptian Fractions

These three problems together offer students an opportunity to engage with some mathematical ideas in depth and not just with the rather mechanical process of adding and subtracting fractions.

This problem in particular requires students to compare fractions and may deepen their understanding of their relative sizes.

Students should already have worked with fractions of the form $\frac{1}{n}$, $\frac{2}{n}$ and possibly $\frac{3}{n}$ and $\frac{4}{n}$ in Keep It Simple and Egyptian Fractions .

To give students a 'feel' for the difficulty of expressing fractions as the Egyptians did, ask students to work in pairs for a short time finding an Egyptian sum for any fraction of their choice. Note, all the unit fractions in the summation must be unique. Any that they can't do can be written on the board for others to attempt.

Draw the group together and share strategies. Compare their efficiency. Do they always give the same result?

If you start with $\frac{4}{5}$, for example, and apply students' different strategies, you may end up with different outcomes:

$\frac{4}{5} = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{20}$ or

$\frac{4}{5} = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{5} + \frac{1}{10}$ or

$\frac{4}{5} = \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} + \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{15} + \frac{1}{30}$

....

If no-one has suggested it, introduce the Greedy Algorithm and check to see if anyone has used it already.

Ask students to choose fractions of their own and apply the Greedy Algorithm. Does it always work?

Can they find a convincing explanation?

Is our fraction larger or smaller than $\frac{1}{2}$? How do we know?

Is our fraction larger or smaller than $\frac{1}{3}$? How do we know?

Is our fraction larger or smaller than $\frac{1}{4}$? How do we know?

....

Students who need support in comparing the size of fractions might have to do some preliminary work on equivalent fractions.

Alternatively, they could convert them to decimal equivalents using a calculator.

Students could try to prove why Fibonnacci's Greedy Algorithm always terminates (the numerators always decrease and must therefore reach one).

Does the Greedy Algorithm always result in the sum with the fewest possible terms?

Can anyone find a counter example?

The Eye of Horus: often it was good enough to use only the fractions

that represent $\frac{1}{2}$, $\frac{1}{4}$, $\frac{1}{8}$.... to get a fraction that is close enough to any specific fraction. Suggest that students pick some fractions and convert them to this form of Egyptian fraction.

How close does this method get to the target fraction?

Students might like to research how these particular fractions were written down in pictorial form.