# Square to a rectangle

Kevin has moved some tiles to change the shape of his patio from a square to a rectangle. What are the lengths of the sides of the rectangle?

Kevin had some square patio tiles which he arranged to make a square.

He decided to change it into a rectangle by making one of the sides 3 tiles shorter, and the other side 4 tiles longer.

To make this change, Kevin only needed to buy one extra tile.

What are the lengths of the sides of the rectangle?

*This problem is adapted from the World Mathematics Championships*

**Answer**: 10 tiles by 17 tiles

**Finding an expression for the change in the number of tiles**

Original patio:

Image

Shorten one side by 3 tiles:

Image

Other side 4 tiles longer:

Image

Needed 1 extra tile to make this change, so 4$(a-$3$)$ = 3$a$ + 1, so 4$a-$12 = 3$a$ + 1, so $a-$12 = 1, so $a$ = 13.

13 tiles by 13 tiles square $\Rightarrow$ 10 tiles by 17 tiles rectangle.

**Using quadratic expressions for the total area before and after**

Before: After:

Image

Image

The new arrangement uses one extra tile, so $$\begin{align}n^2+1&=(n-3)(n+4)\\

n^2+1&=n^2+4n-3n-12\\

n^2+1&=n^2+n-12\\

1&=n-12\\

13&=n\end{align}$$

So Kevin had a $13$ tiles by $13$ tiles square, which means that he made a $10$ tiles by $17$ tiles rectangle.

**Trying out numbers**

The patio used to be a square, so we can test some square numbers to see whether they work.

If the patio started as a 10 tiles by 10 tiles square, then Kevin would have had 100 tiles.

Making one side 3 tiles shorter and the other side 4 tiles longer would have given him a 7 by 14 rectangle.

7$\times$14 = 98, so Kevin would have had 2 spare tiles if he had started off with a 10 by 10 square. But Kevin needed 1 extra tile, so that can't be right.

If the patio started as a 9 tiles by 9 tiles square, then Kevin would have had 81 tiles.

Making one side 3 tiles shorter and the other side 4 tiles longer would have given him a 6 by 13 rectangle.

6$\times$13 = 78, so Kevin would have had 3 spare tiles if he had started off with a 9 by 9 square. That is worse than the 10 by 10 square, because the 10 by 10 square would only have given Kevin 2 spare tiles. So Kevin's patio must have started as a square that was larger than 10 tiles by 10 tiles.

If the patio started as a 12 tiles by 12 tiles square, then Kevin would have had 144 tiles.

Making one side 3 tiles shorter and the other side 4 tiles longer would have given him a 9 by 16 rectangle.

9$\times$16 = 144, so Kevin would have had exactly the right number of tiles if he started off with a 12 by 12 square and wouldn't have needed to buy 1 extra tile.

If the patio started as a 13 tiles by 13 tiles square, then Kevin would have had 169 tiles.

Making one side 3 tiles shorter and the other side 4 tiles longer would give him a 10 by 17 rectangle.

10$\times$17 = 170, so Kevin would need 1 extra tile to make the rectangle - which is right!

So he must have made a 10 tiles by 17 tiles rectangle.