Cross with the scalar product
Problem
Consider the vector
Investigate the properties of vectors ${\bf u}$ such that ${\bf u}\cdot {\bf v}=0$.
Describe geometrically the set of all such vectors ${\bf u}$.
Now explore the possibilities for vectors ${\bf w}$ which are the result of taking the vector cross product of ${\bf v}$ with another vector. How does this relate to the first part of the question?
Which of these vectors could arise from taking the vector cross product of ${\bf v}$ with another vector? Before performing lots of algebra, can you work out a quick way to make your decision?
Can you find a way of quickly constructing other such vectors?
Getting Started
Always remember the key geometrical facts about scalar and cross products for non-zero vectors ${\bf u}$ and ${\bf v}$:
1) ${\bf u}\cdot {\bf v}=0$ if and only if ${\bf u}$ and ${\bf v}$ are perpendicular.
2) ${\bf u}\times {\bf v}=0$ if and only if ${\bf u}$ and ${\bf v}$ are parallel.
3) ${\bf u}\times {\bf v}$ is perpendicular to both ${\bf u}$ and ${\bf v}$.
This problem uses mathematical concepts covered in the later Further Pure Mathematics A Level Modules.
Student Solutions
Steve writes:
The scalar product between two vectors is the sum of the product of the components. Let
Since the components of $\bf v$ are all non-zero I can choose anything for $y$ and $z$ so long as I choose $x= -(2y+3z)$. This is the equation of a plane $P: x+2y+3z=0$, which is perpendicular to the vector ${\bf v}$. This makes sense: the scalar product of two vectors is zero if and only if they are perpendicular to each other.
Next, taking a cross product between two vectors always gives a vector which is perpendicular to the original two vectors. So, I should be able to make any vector perpendicular to ${\bf v}$ by taking cross products. These are all vectors lying in the plane $P$.
To decide which vectors ${\bf u}$ solve ${\bf u}\cdot {\bf v}=0$ for a given vector ${\bf v}$ I need to decide which vectors are perpendicular to ${\bf v}$.
To do this, I could take any linear combination of ${\bf i \times v}, {\bf j \times v}$ and ${\bf j \times v}$
etc.
From this it seems that I just need to switch 2 non-zero components and change the sign of one of them to make a vector perpendicular to a given vector. In hindsight, this is obvious!
Doug writes:
Solution 2:
Dot $
For the 2nd part, again cross $\mathbf{v}$, using a general vector, and find with the "determinant method":
To quickly create a vector $\mathbf{u}$ such that $\mathbf{u}\cdot\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{0}$, I first looked at the general case with vectors $
However, when I tried this solution on the examples given, I found that with the final example, there was a divide by zero error.
To get round this, we instead add a caveat to the algorithm to swap a,b,c to ensure that there is a non-zero denominator. So in the final case, we set $y = \frac{a+c}{b} = 0 \Rightarrow
In general, the cross product of two vectors is:
Solution 1:
Under development
${\bf u}\cdot {\bf v}=\pmatrix {u_1\cr u_2\cr u_3}\cdot\pmatrix{1\cr 2\cr 3}$= $u_1 + 2u_2 + 3u_3$ =0
We therefore have 1 independent equation and 3 unknows which results in an infinite number of solutions.
One vector which satisifies this relationship is ${\bf u} = \pmatrix {0\cr0\cr0}$
If we take a general vector ${\bf z} = \pmatrix {z_1\cr z_2\cr z_3}$ then:
This gives us a relationship between the components of ${\bf z}$ and ${\bf w}$ in the form of 3 simultaneous equations.
Solving equation 1 and equation 3 simultaneously:
from equation3 we find that $z_2 = w_3 +2z_2$
if we now sustitute $z_2$ into equation1 we find that $-6z_1 + 2z_3 = 3w_3 + w_1$
This result is actually equation2 but scaled which implies that there are actually only two independent equations but still 3 unknows $( z_1, z_2, z_3)$. We are therefore unable to find a unique solution, there are once again an infinite number of solutions.
An alternative method of deducing this result would be to rewrite the equations in matrix form, a 0 determinant to this matrix would indicate that there are an infinite number of solutions.
In matrix form:
If we now take the determinant by expanding by the top row.
Determinant = 0 - -3( 0 - (-1)(-2) ) + 2( (3)(1) - 0) = -6 +6 = 0
Note: The above matrix is anti-symmetric, an anti-symmetric matrix of this form always results from taking the cross product of two vectors, the determinant of an odd order (in this case 3 x 3) anti-symmetric matrx will always give a zero determinant.
Define any vector ${\bf V}$= $\pmatrix {v_1\cr v_2\cr v_3}$
${\bf v}\cdot {\bf u}=\pmatrix{u_1\cr u_2\cr u_3}\cdot\pmatrix{v_1\cr v_2\cr v_3}$= $u_1v_1 + u_2v_2 + u_3v_3$ =0
If ${\bf V}\cdot {\bf U}$ = 0 then the two vectors are orthogonal, to determine ${\bf u}$ we therefore need to find a vector which is perpendicular to ${\bf v}$
Define vector ${\bf z}$= $\pmatrix {z_1\cr z_2\cr z_3}$
The cross product of any 2 vectors will yield a vector perpendicular to both of the original vectors, the cross product of ${\bf v}$ and ${\bf z}$ will therefore give a vector which is perpendicular to ${\bf v}$ (and ${\bf z}$), hence the cross product gives a vector which satisfies the condition for ${\bf u}$.
${\bf V }x{\bf Z}$=$\pmatrix {v_1\cr v_2\cr v_3} x \pmatrix{z_1\cr z_2\cr z_3}$=
then
$ v_2z_3 - v_3z_2 = u_1$
$v_3z_1 - v_1z_3 = u_2$
$v_1z_2 - v_2z_1 =u_3$
${\bf u}= \pmatrix { v_2z_3 - v_3z_2\cr v_3z_1 - v_1z_3 \cr v_1z_2 - v_2z_1 }$
Note: ${\bf z}$ can be selected as any vector.
Example: Let${\bf z }= \pmatrix { 1\cr 5 \cr 11 }$ and ${\bf v}=\pmatrix { 1\cr 2 \cr 3 }$
Then from the above formula ${\bf u} = \pmatrix { 7\cr -8 \cr 3 }$
And ${\bf U}\cdot {\bf V} = 7 -16 + 9 = 0$
if we now need
${\bf V }x{\bf U }={\bf W}$
$ v_2u_3 - v_3u_2 = w_1$
$v_3u_1 - v_1u_3 = w_2$
$v_1u_2 - v_2u_1 =w_3$
if we let $u_1 = k$, then:
$u_2 = \frac{w_3 - Kv_2}{v_1}$
$u_3 = \frac{-w_2 + Kv_3}{v_1}$
so ${\bf U} =\pmatrix {K\cr \frac{w_3 - Kv_2}{v_1}\cr \frac{-w_2 + Kv_3}{v_1}}$ (Valid when $v_1$ is non zero)
similarly by letting $u_2$ and $u_3$ = K in turn we find 2 further possibilities
${\bf U} =\pmatrix {\frac{-w_3 +Kv_1}{v_2} \cr K\cr \frac{w_1 + Kv_3}{v_2}}$ (Valid when $v_2$ is non zero)
${\bf U} =\pmatrix {\frac{w_2 +Kv_1}{v_3} \cr \frac{-w_1 + Kv_2}{v_3}\cr K}$ (Valid when $v_3$ is non zero)