What 2D shapes can you name? Which are easy to draw and which difficult? Enjoy exploring these activities which all focus on 2D shapes ...
Let's Investigate Triangles
Vincent and Tara are making triangles with the class construction set. They have a pile of strips of different lengths. How many different triangles can they make?
Problem
Vincent and Tara are making triangles with strips from the class construction set.
They have strips of three different lengths: 4 holes, 7 holes and 11 holes.
There are plenty of strips of each length.
Vincent makes a triangle with two strips that are length 7 and one strip that is length 4, like this:
Tara makes a triangle with three strips that are each length 11, like this:
How many different triangles can you make using strips that are length 4, length 7 and/or length 11?
You can use the interactivity below to try out your ideas if you do not have a construction set.
Can you find three strips which cannot be made into a triangle when you use them together?
Why is it impossible to make a triangle from those three strips?
Getting Started
Have you made triangles with all the sides the same colour?
Have you made triangles with all the sides different colours?
Have you found three sticks you can't make a triangle with?
This sheet will give you four copies of each strip in the colours in the problem, which you could print off and cut out.
Student Solutions
Thank you to everybody who sent in their solutions to this activity. We received lots of good ideas about which triangles were possible or impossible to make.
Zoe from Halstead Preparatory School in the UK sent us this picture:
Well done for checking every possible combination, Zoe! Zoe says that the longest side of a triangle has to be shorter than the other two sides put together. I wonder why?
We also had this picture sent in from Vivienne and Georgy at Halstead Preparatory School:
Well done for using practical resources to check each triangle! These pictures show really clearly why each triangle is either possible or not possible.
We also had similar solutions sent in from Viren KS and from Ariana, Ayda, Ishita and Rhea from Halstead Preparatory School. Thank you all for sending us your ideas.
Teachers' Resources
Why do this problem?
This problem allows children to make important discoveries about triangles through representing the sides of triangles with strips from a construction kit. They will have the opportunity to find out which combinations of lengths cannot be made into triangles, and why this is so.
If learners have access to the physical resources, they may also discover how rigid triangles are, and that three fixed lengths can only be arranged in one way (unlike other polygons such as quadrilaterals where the angles can be changed).
Ideally, this investigation would be carried out using a construction set and therefore requires plenty of equipment and space. However, the interactivity will enable all children to access the mathematics to some extent, even without the hands-on resources.
Possible approach
You may like to show one of the triangle images to the class and ask them what they see, and what they would like to ask. Give learners time to talk in pairs before sharing their thoughts with the whole group. Some of the observations may not be mathematical, but it is important all comments are valued at this stage.
Build on what is said to introduce the problem, encouraging children to work in pairs on making different triangles with lengths 4, 7 and 11. (They will benefit from talking through their ideas with a partner.) If you do not have access to a construction set, learners could use the interactivity in pairs on a tablet or computer. You may want to demonstrate how to change the length of the strips and how to rotate each strip first.
In a mini plenary, you could discuss how they are keeping track of the triangles they are making, and you may like to draw attention to any pairs who are recording in some way. For example, children may sketch the triangles, or record just using the length of the strips used.
You could invite pairs to record a triangle they have made on the whiteboard for everyone to see, and that way you will gradually build up a class solution (this will be made easier if the class agrees on a way of recording as a group first). Emphasise that when another solution is added to the board, it is everyone's responsibility to check it, and to make sure it is not a repeat of one already there.
In the plenary, you can look at the class solutions altogether. It might be useful to record each solution on a separate sheet of paper so they can be moved around and ordered, to help reveal any that are missing. In this way, the group can be sure that all possiblities are found. As the discussion proceeds, make a note of any combinations of three rods that don't make a triangle. To conclude the lesson, invite learners to have a go at explaining why three particular rods cannot make a triangle. They may manipulate strips a bit like this:
This shows that the red and blue rods are not long enough to make a triangle with the green rod. Some children may have a 'feel' for this idea of relative length without needing to use the strips to convince themselves and others.
Key questions
Have you made any triangles using this length of strip?
Have you made any triangles with all the sides the same length?
Have you made any triangles with all the sides different lengths?
Are you sure you/we haven't made one like that already?
Why do you think you can't make a triangle with those three strips?
Possible support
Some learners might find it helpful to use just two lengths to start with. (Make sure that the longest one is shorter than two of the others put together lengthways e.g. strips which are 4 holes and 6 holes long.) You can make four different triangles with these. You can then add a third length.
Possible extension
Children could be encouraged to find a way to show that they have discovered all of the possible triangles using four different lengths. Some learners might like to have a go at the task Sticks and Triangles, which explores the construction of triangles further, culminating in a full generalisation.
Matching Triangles
Can you sort these triangles into three different families and explain how you did it?
Problem
These triangles belong to three different families.
All the triangles in the same family are the same shape.
But they may not be the same size or the same way up.
Can you sort them out and explain how you did it?
You could print off pictures of the triangles (here as a Word document or here as a pdf), then cut them out and sort them practically. Or if you prefer, you could use the interactivity below to try out your ideas:
Getting Started
Try concentrating on one triangle at a time. Perhaps you can imagine moving it around in your head so that it is a different way up?
You could print off this sheet of the triangles, then cut them out to sort them. (The first page is in colour, the second in black and white.)
Student Solutions
This problem was more complicated than it first appeared! We had this solution sent in from Dhruv, who is homeschooled in the UK:
Dhruv has looked at the angles within each triangle, and has also labelled the three groups according to whether they are equilateral, isosceles or scalene. Well done Dhruv, you're correct that the triangles in the middle group have angles which are all less than 90 degrees! The triangles on the left do each have an angle of 90 degrees, but they aren't all scalene. Can you see which ones belong in the group on the right instead?
Harry from Copthorne Prep School in the UK sent in a picture of his three families of triangles, with some thoughts:
First Harry thought of sorting the triangles by colour but noticed that would give more than the three families specified. He then remembered he’d heard of an equilateral triangle that had equal sides and identified 4 from the selection that had equal sides. Harry then looked at the remaining triangles and identified a group of tall, thin triangles. On closer inspection they had two sides equal in length.
The final four therefore had to be the third family. They didn’t appear to have any sides of equal length.
We discussed whether length of the sides was the only ‘same’ thing about the equilateral triangles. Harry remembered that the internal angles must add up to 180 degrees and the angles all looked the same in this triangle meaning they’d be 60 degrees each. It wasn’t so easy to be able to say what the angles on the other types would be, but they would all always total 180 degrees.
Harry looked into what names the other types of triangle families might have and learned the triangle with two sides the same is called Isosceles and the triangle with no sides the same is called a Scalene triangle.
Good ideas, Harry! These three groups are the families that we were thinking of, but I'm not sure that the triangles in the group on the left are equilateral triangles. How could I check?
Emily from St James School said:
I think that these triangles are sorted into right-angled scalene, right-angled isosceles and non-right-angled isosceles.
There are no equilateral triangles because they do not ever have any right angles and none of those triangles had the same sides and angles.
Well done Emily, those are the correct labels for the three families!
Which way round would those three labels go on Harry's diagram?
Teachers' Resources
Why do this problem?
This activity is a good one to try with young children once they are familiar with the properties of a triangle. Often, they associate the name 'triangle' with a shape in a particular orientation and this problem is an excellent way to challenge this assumption. Other children may dismiss all three-sided shapes as triangles without looking at their other attributes. The activity will require pupils to look carefully at each shape and scrutinise its properties.
Possible approach
You could start by asking the group to tell you what they know about triangles. You could then ask one child to draw a triangle on the board and ask someone else to draw a different triangle. Invite the group to talk about what is the same and what is different about them. In this way, the discussion will include shape, size and orientation, but you could draw some triangles yourself to bring out certain aspects.
Next you could project the interactivity onto the interactive whiteboard, or show them the triangles on these sheets. (The first page has the triangles in colour, the second in black and white so that it can be photocopied.) Introduce the task and encourage the group to work in pairs with a set of cut-out triangles so that they are able to talk through their ideas with a partner. Listening to their justifications can reveal a lot about their understanding of similar triangles, even though this terminology is not used.
You can draw the class together for mini plenaries, as appropriate, perhaps to share misunderstandings or ways of working. You may wish to use the interactivity for drawing attention to particular triangles (it does not allow you to rotate the triangles). Once the majority of pairs have grouped their triangles in some way, invite the class to wander around the room looking at the arrangements. What do they notice? Do they have any questions? The interactivity could be used again to re-create a solution.
Key questions
Possible extension
Children could draw their own families of triangles and label the differences and similarities.
Possible support
Use one of these sheets so that the triangles can be cut out, then rotated and placed on top of one another. (The first page has the triangles in colour, the second in black and white.)
Sorting Logic Blocks
This activity focuses on similarities and differences between shapes.
Problem
For this task, you'll need some blocks of different shapes and colours, or you could print off and cut out the shapes on this sheet.
Choose a rule, like 'only have four-sided shapes' or 'only have large shapes'.
Challenge someone else to work out your rule.
They can do this by choosing a shape for you to say either "Yes, that obeys my rule and is in my set" (you then put it over on the left) or "No, this does not obey my rule and so is not in my set" (you then put it over on the right).
How did they decide which shapes to choose?
Did they get quicker at finding out the rule?
What was the smallest number of shapes they needed to try?
Could you make some more shapes to add to the set? What would you make and why?
Tell us about some of the rules you chose and how you decided which shapes to try.
Getting Started
You can choose any shape to begin with!
What do you know so far?
Which shape would be a good one to choose next?
Student Solutions
Maya and MatthewӬ from Beechwood ParkӬ School wrote in to say:
It took Matthew three shapes to guess my rule. My rule was that the shape had to have a point.
Oliver also from Beechwood ParkӬ added his rule:
Anything with one side or four sides but not rectangles.
I am quessing that probably many children got involved in this activity with or without their teacher but perhaps they did not see that they had a "solution". It's always interesting to hear about any response to the activities, even if there is no "solution" as such.
Teachers' Resources
Why do this activity?
This activity can be used to build up children's confidence with the language associated with 2D shape.
Possible approach
You can do this activity as a whole class, teacher-led activity, by creating shapes on the interactive whiteboard. Choose a particular property and drag a shape which meets that criteria to the left of the screen underneath a title of something like 'These shapes are in my set', or simply 'Yes'. (Alternatively, you could print off, laminate and cut out shapes from this sheet and stick them to the board.)
The first time you do this it's a good idea to conduct it in silence. Children take turns to come to the front and select a shape. Without saying anything, you drag it to the appropriate side of the screen. When they think they know your rule they could write it down on their whiteboards.
Once they become familiar with the game, you can interrogate them about their choices. 'Why did you choose that one?'; 'I'll put that one here - what does that tell you?'.
You could then give out sets of the shapes to pairs of children for them to try themselves (if you have 'logiblocks' these are ideal, otherwise print off shapes from the sheet). In this way, you can use the same activity to highlight different properties of shapes so it can be returned to many times over the course of an academic year.
Key questions
Why did you choose that one?
I'll put that one here - what does that tell you?
Which would be a good one to choose now? Why?
Possible support
For a class that is less confident, you could scaffold their learning by writing several different rules on the board. They then know that your rule is one of those and can choose accordingly. Children could make up their own rule for you to write.
Possible extension
Challenge children to use as few shapes as possible to test their ideas.