You may also like

Tweedle Dum and Tweedle Dee

Two brothers were left some money, amounting to an exact number of pounds, to divide between them. DEE undertook the division. "But your heap is larger than mine!" cried DUM...

Sum Equals Product

The sum of the numbers 4 and 1 [1/3] is the same as the product of 4 and 1 [1/3]; that is to say 4 + 1 [1/3] = 4 � 1 [1/3]. What other numbers have the sum equal to the product and can this be so for any whole numbers?

Special Sums and Products

Find some examples of pairs of numbers such that their sum is a factor of their product. eg. 4 + 12 = 16 and 4 × 12 = 48 and 16 is a factor of 48.

How Long Is the Cantor Set?

Age 11 to 14
Challenge Level

Gregory from Magnus C of E School in Nottingham and Luke from St Patrick's School reasoned correctly. Here is Luke's explanation:

For this question I found a pattern in it:
For example $C_1$ has length of 1 and $C_2$ has length of $\frac{2}{3}$
and there is a pattern in this because 1 $\times$2 = 2, so there is your numerator,
and to get your denominator you multiply 1 by 3, so there you have your $\frac{2}{3}$.

So to put this into easier words, it simply means multiply the numerator by 2 the whole way and multiply the denominator by 3.
So there is my strategy.

So the answer to $C_3$ is $\frac{4}{9}$
and the answer to $C_4$ is $\frac{8}{27}$
and finally $C_5$ is $\frac{16}{81}$.
$C_n$ is $\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)^{n-1}$
and when n $\rightarrow$ infinity, $ C_n \rightarrow$ 0

David from Gordonstoun School got the same result and added:
In a geometric progression,
$a$ = $ 1^{st}$ term
$r$ = constant factor
$n$ = number of terms

Any value in a geometric progression is $ ar^{n-1}$
In this case
$a$ = 1
$r$ = $\frac{2}{3}$

$r$ = $\frac{2}{3}$ (which is less than 1),
so the higher its power, the closer the result is to zero.
(Any positive number smaller than 1, to the power of infinity, tends to zero.
Therefore $ r^{n}$ tends to zero)

So as $n$ tends to infinity,
$ar^{n-1}$ tends to $a \times 0 = 0$
So the Cantor Set's length is zero.

Liam from Wilbarston School reasoned in a similar way:

The length of $C_{n+1}$ is simply two thirds of the length of $C_n$,
as $C_{n+1}$ is purely $C_n$ with the middle thirds removed.

Now taking $L_n$ to be the length of $C_n$:
$L_2$ = $\frac{2}{3}$,
$L_3$ = $\frac{4}{9}$,
$L_4$ = $\frac{8}{27}$ etc. etc.

It's obvious that $L_n$ = $\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)^{n-1}$.
So as n tends to infinity, $L_n$ gets increasingly smaller, i.e. tends to zero.

Therefore the length of the Cantor set is zero. In fact, the Cantor set is a set of points, because endpoints of line segments will never be removed, only middle thirds.

And as Euclid said, 'A point is that which has no part', i.e. a point has zero length, zero width and zero height.

Well done to you all.