Skip to main content
### Number and algebra

### Geometry and measure

### Probability and statistics

### Working mathematically

### For younger learners

### Advanced mathematics

# Googol

## You may also like

### A Close Match

Links to the University of Cambridge website
Links to the NRICH website Home page

Nurturing young mathematicians: teacher webinars

30 April (Primary), 1 May (Secondary)

30 April (Primary), 1 May (Secondary)

Or search by topic

Age 16 to 18

ShortChallenge Level

- Problem
- Solutions

The numbers in the problem are too large for computers to deal
with in a straightforward fashion (or, rather, were in 2011), so we
need to use pure mathematics to help us. There are at least two
possible positive ways forwards:

First, you might notice that the inequality is a quadratic in the
variable $n^2$. You could solve the corresponding equality and use
this to work out the minimum value of $n$ by rounding up the answer
to the next largest integer.

Alternatively, you could notice that $10^{100}=(10^{25})^4$. So,
it is quite clear that $n=10^{25}$ is too small.

What about $10^{25}+1$? We can substitute this value and use the
binomial theorem to show that $$ \begin{eqnarray}
(10^{25}+1)^4-6(10^{25}+1)^2&=&\left(10^{100} +4\times
10^{75} + 6\times 10^{50} +4\times 10^{25} + 1\right)\cr
&&\quad\quad- 6\left(10^{50}+2\times 10^{25}+1\right)
\cr

&=& 10^{100}+4\times 10^{75}-8\times 10^{25}-5

\end{eqnarray} $$ It might seem 'obvious' that this value is
greater than $10^{100}+1$ but it is a good idea to get into the
habit of writing down precisely why it is obvious - the problem
here is that we are suggesting the that sum of three different
terms is greater than $1$. A simple way forward is to write
out an inequality where we simplify one of the terms at each stage
until we are left with just two terms as follows:

$$

\begin{eqnarray}

4\times 10^{75}-8\times 10^{25}-5&> & 10^{75}
- 8\times 10^{25}-5\cr

&> & 10^{75}-10^{26}-5\cr

&> & 10^{75}-2\times 10^{26}\cr

&> & 10^{75}-10^{27}\cr &> &1
\end{eqnarray}

$$

(Note: you might not see the 'point' of these inequality
manipulations: they are useful because it is clear and easy to
verify each individual step. This turns something which might just
be controversial into something that is not at all
controversial.)

Now for writing out the number $N$ on the left hand side of the inequality. As the number is so large a computer or a spreadsheet will not easily help us. Keeping the '+1' part separate for as long as possible gives us (where $X=10^{25}$)

$$ \begin{eqnarray} N &=& (X+1)^4-6(X+1)^2 \cr &=& X^4+4X^3+6X^2+4X+1 - 6(X^2+2X+1)\cr &=& X^4+4X^3-8X-5 \end{eqnarray} $$ The structure of this number is now clear to us and includes the problematic negative terms, which we can deal with one at a time.

Firstly, $8\times 10^{25}$ is represented as $8$ followed by $25$ zeros. Removing this from the part $4\times 10^{75}$ leaves a number of the form

$$

100\dots 0039\dots 9200\dots 00

$$

Removing the $5$ from this gives a number of the form

$$

100\dots 0039\dots 9199\dots 995

$$

The trick is now to get the $1$s and the $3$ in the correct place.
If we consider the number as a string of digits, counted from the
right, then the first $1$ with be in the 101st place, the $3$ in
the 76th place and the second 1 in the 26th place.

10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,003,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,919,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,995

Phew! Who would have thought that place value could be so tricky? If you are planning on entering a career in finance or science then part of your computer programming will be to ensure that large numbers that you enter into your code are accurate. A lot could rest on this accuracy, so patient and careful detail are the key skills required.

Can you massage the parameters of these curves to make them match as closely as possible?