Or search by topic
Nabeelah from Langley Grammar School commented that:
Philippa from Ashcroft Academy worked
out that Earl had the most suspicious results:
I think Earl is the cheat because his heads and tails are pretty
much equal as if he tried too hard to simulate the random pattern
of a coin.
Another way of telling that Earl is the most likely cheat is to notice that he has no strings of repeated results of length of 5 or more, and when you realise that there are 95 strings of 6 consecutive results (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th - 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th - 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th...) you may find it suspicious that long strings of repeated results do not appear at all.