In the game of squash, players gain "points'' by winning
"rallies''. If the "server'' wins a rally, he or she wins a
point; otherwise the service changes hands with no points
gained. In theory the game could go on for ever with each
player losing all their serves. Note that if in two consecutive
rallies both players lose their serve, then the situation is
exactly the same as it was before these two serves.
Normally the game is won by the first player to reach 9 points,
typically by 2 or more points. But if the score reaches 8-8
then the person due to receive serve can call "9'' (in which
case the first to reach 9 wins) or call "10'' (in which case
the first to reach 10 wins). In December 2000 the problem was
set of deciding whether a player should call "9'' or "10'' if
that player has a fixed probability of winning any particular
rally, regardless of whether serving or receiving.
We call the players A and B, and we assume that the probability
that A wins a rally is $p$, whether he serves or not, and
whatever the score is. The corresponding probability for B is
$q$, where $p+q=1$.
At any given time there are four outcomes to be considered,
namely A or B is the first to serve, and A or B wins the next
point. There may be many rallies before anyone scores this
point We are interested in finding the four probabilities:
\begin{equation*} Pr(\hbox{A wins the next point given that A
serves first})= \theta, \end{equation*} \begin{equation*}
Pr(\hbox{A wins the next point given that B serves first})=
\varphi, \end{equation*} \begin{equation*} Pr(\hbox{B wins the
next point given that A serves first})= \lambda,
\end{equation*} \begin{equation*} Pr(\hbox{B wins the next
point given that B serves first})= \mu. \end{equation*}
Let us find $\theta$. One possibility is that $A$ wins the
first rally, and hence the first point; he does this with
probability $p$. If not, he loses it with probability $q$ and
$B$ then serves. Then for $A$ to win the next point he must win
the next rally (with probability $p$) and then the situation
returns to that in which $A$ serves and wins the next point
with probability $\theta$. Thus $\theta = p + qp\theta$, and
hence \[Pr(\hbox{A wins the next point given that A serves
first})= \theta = {p\over 1-pq}.\] Next, we find $\varphi$. As
$B$ serves first, $A$ must win the next rally (with probability
$p$). The position now is that $A$ is serving and must win the
next point (which he does with probability $\theta$). Thus
$\varphi = p\theta$, and hence \[ Pr(\hbox{A wins the next
point given that B serves first})= \varphi ={p^2\over 1-pq}.\]
By interchanging $A$ with $B$, and $p$ with $q$, we see that
\[Pr(\hbox{B wins the next point given that A serves first})=
\lambda ={q^2\over 1-pq},\] and \[Pr(\hbox{B wins the next
point given that B serves first})= \mu ={q\over 1-pq}.\] Note
that \[ Pr(\hbox{A or B wins the next point given that B serves
first})= \varphi + \mu, \] and \[\varphi + \mu = {p^2\over
1-pq}+ {q\over 1-pq} ={p(1-q)+q\over 1-pq}={p+q-pq\over
1-pq}={1-pq\over 1-pq}=1.\] It follows that if $B$ serves
first, then the probability that $A$ or $B$ eventually wins a
point is one; h
ence the
probability that the game goes on for ever is zero! You
may like to draw a tree diagram to illustrate this, and you
will find that a succession of rallies in which nobody scores a
point is represented by a long 'zig-zag' in your tree diagram.
The start of the tree diagram is given below.
The rules of squash say that if the position is reached when the
score is $(8,8)$ (we give A's score first), and $B$ is to serve,
then $A$ must choose between the game ending when the first
player reaches $9$ or when the first player reaches $10$. We want
to decide what is the best choice for $A$ to make (when $p$ and
$q$ are known).
If $A$ chooses $9$, then he wins the game with probability
$\varphi$. Suppose now that $A$ chooses $10$; then the sequence
of possible scores and their associated probabilities are as
follows:
| Sequence of scores |
Probability |
Probability in terms of $p,q$ |
| $(8,8) \to (9,8) \to (10,8)$ |
$\varphi \times \theta$ |
$p^3/(1-pq)^2$ |
| $(8,8)\to (8,9)\to (9,9) \to (10,9)$ |
$\mu\times\varphi\times\theta$ |
$p^3q/(1-pq)^3$ |
| $(8,8) \to (9,8) \to (9,9) \to (10,9)$ |
$\varphi \times \lambda\times \varphi$ |
$p^4q^2/(1-pq)^3$ |
It follows that the choice of $9$ by $A$ is best for $A$ if
$\varphi > \varphi\theta + \mu\varphi\theta +
\varphi^2\lambda$, or, equivalently, $1 > \theta + \mu\theta
+ \varphi\lambda$. In terms of $p$ and $q$ this inequality is
\[1 > {p\over 1-pq} + {pq\over (1-pq)^2} + {p^2q^2\over
(1-pq)^2},\] and this is equivalent to \[(1-pq)^2 >
p(1-pq)+pq+p^2q^2.\] After simplification (remember that
$p+q=1$), this is equivalent to $p^2-3p+1> 0$. This means
that $A$ should choose $9$ if $p < 0.38$ and should choose
$10$ if $p> 0.38$.
[See the problem
Squash on the NRICH site.]