Copyright © University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.
In her studies of children learning about rational numbers, Grace
Lopez-Charles [see Note 1 below] has identified some different
perspectives through which children see fractions. This article
starts looking at some of those perspectives, firstly by
considering what happens in situations where learners are trying to
create equal shares. From sharing using halves learners move to
partitioning using other divisions, such as fifths or sixths. This
results in the need to develop understandings of equivalence which
is discussed in the second section of this article. Finally, we
look at some ways of teaching fractions more effectively that arise
from Grace's work.
Equal shares
Working with halves
This strategy appears to be based upon halves because children
are confident with this concept. This approach is more common among
younger children, although in her studies Grace has seen many
children between the ages of $7$ and $10$ adopting it too. Using
this method, the child starts by splitting each region or composite
unit into two parts. So, sharing three chocolate bars between four
children would be achieved by first halving all the bars. In this
case four of the halves can be shared with one whole bar (two
halves) remaining. The parts of the third bar are halved again and
can now be shared. If a fair share was not possible at this point
further halving would take place. At this point a teacher might ask
the child "How much has each person got?" and in offering a
description the child might reply "Two" because they are counting
fragments rather than seeing the equal share as part of a
whole.
Stuck on counting
In fragmenting the child treats the parts as individual unit
items. So, when asked to determine what share each child will
receive if three chocolate bars are shared equally among four
children, some $7$ year-olds would respond that a child receives
two. No conceptual distinction is being made between the 'two' as
in number of pieces and the 'two' pieces as fractions of each unit,
or the whole (three bars) that is being shared. These children are
aware of the fragments as only individual unit items. The
complexity here is also whether the 'whole' refers to the
individual bars, in which case each child gets three-quarters of
the bar, or the 'whole' refers to the three bars. In this latter
case the answer would be "A quarter of the chocolate". Here a
teacher would be trying to emphasise that we cannot always
successfully describe quantity by counting. It would be necessary
for portions to be equal in size for counting to offer a way
forward.
Partitioning
Even young children can partition regions or composite units
approximately equally among two or three recipients. The older,
more mathematically-mature child can partition the region into $x$
number of parts and then designate $y$ of the parts to indicate
$\frac{y}{x}$ where $x$ is greater than $2$.
For example: $8$ year-old children were asked to divide a rectangle
into eight pieces and then colour two of the pieces red in a
diagram similar to the one below.
The issue here becomes one of
equivalence. Grace found that when learners are asked what fraction
is unshaded they would say $\frac{6}{8}$. No children in the
research identified the coloured part as being $\frac{1}{4}$ of the
whole or the uncoloured part as $\frac{3}{4}$. This highlights a
question for teachers about how they might raise awareness of those
equivalences. This might be achieved through questions inviting
learners to describe the same fraction in different ways or by
identifying problems with equal answers. For example, in the latter
case, sharing $6$ bars of chocolate between $8$ will result in the
same amount of chocolate each as sharing $3$ bars between $4$.
"Could you get the same answer in a different way?"
In seeing the fraction as a partition and identifying what is
the same and what is different about $\frac{3}{4}$ and
$\frac{6}{8}$ learners begin to see the fraction as a comparison
between the numerator and the denominator (what Grace calls
one-to-many or many-to-many comparison). This is based on a ratio
concept and Grace argues it also indicates a deeper understanding
of fractions. As in the previous example, a child indicating that
the uncoloured fraction of the square is three-quarters, is
simplifying the denominator and numerator to give an equivalent
fraction, without losing the value of the fraction, though some
information is lost.
What impact might this have on how we teach children to
understand fractions better?
Ideas for teaching fractions
When teaching fractions in schools, the emphasis is often on
situations where the object can easily be cut, folded, split or
coloured in equal parts. Although there is some need for this sort
of activity, children should be exposed to a wide variety of
situations, some where such folding or splitting strategies will
not be successful. In experiencing a variety of situations where
fractions can be found, learners will have the opportunity to
reflect and abstract critical relations in different contextual
situations. In other words, children must see a whole in all its
representational forms. This will aid them in developing a more
robust grasp of the concept of a fraction. Grace describes some of
these situations in terms of properties of being discrete or
continuous, definite or indefinite (see below). Thus the aim is to
engage in working in situations that offer opportunities to explore
fractions in each of these situations.
Discrete wholes -
sweets, marbles, cherries, beads etc.
Continuous wholes -
cakes, chocolate bars, pizzas etc.
Definite wholes -
where the extent of the whole is clear, for example:
Indefinite wholes -
where the extent of the whole is not clear, for example we do not
know how long the pattern extends in either direction in the image
below:
In developing a sound understanding of the part-whole concept
of fractions, it is necessary for teachers to present situations of
fair sharing, where the child is expected to reason out the
consequences of different actions. For example with the very young,
it might be necessary to begin with a number-free approach;
- Show the children some sweets; question them:- Do you think I
have enough sweets that each child will get one sweet?; What will
happen if I cut each sweet in half?; Will more or less children get
sweets?
- Encourage the children to make meaningful comparisons e.g. '3
pizzas, 4 children', 'does everyone get more or less than half of a
pizza? Does everyone get more or less than a whole pizza?'
By presenting the problem qualitatively, teachers are able to
generate useful discussions that will encourage the children to
use, question and develop their own approaches.
The types of items a teacher sets for individual or group
activities should be geared towards developing the fraction concept
with the purpose of overcoming some of their difficulties with
fractions. By presenting the children with wholes, which are not
explicitly divided into equal parts, they are encouraged to analyse
the part-whole relationship.
For example:
For each figure, write the fraction shown:
(a)What fraction is K?
(b)What fraction of the figure is not coloured?
(c)What fraction of the whole is missing?
Where there is an explicit division of a whole into equal parts,
children are able to determine the fraction of the part/parts
indicated by counting the number of parts in the whole and the
number of parts indicated (double counting). In the figures
presented above, it is more difficult for the children to adopt
this 'partitioning' approach. Children are required to analyse the
relationship of the particular part/parts indicated in relation to
the entire whole.
Fractions taught as a part-whole concept, in the manner
indicated in this article, can ensure that children have a sound
foundation for conceptualising other concepts in fractions.
However, it must be noted that despite the wealth of possible
examples, an approach to fractions based solely on "part-whole" is
too restricted - yielding proper fractions only. Therefore other
concepts of fractions need to be explored if children are to have a
fuller and better understanding of rational numbers.
Note 1:
This article is based on research by Grace Lopez-Charles -
Assessment of Children's Understanding of Rational Numbers - PhD
Thesis.
References:
- Azis, N & Pa, N (1991), Primary school pupils' knowledge of
fractions, Journal for Research in Education, 45
- Nunes, T., (1996), Understanding rational numbers, in T. Nunes
and P.E. Bryant (eds.): Children Doing Mathematics. Oxford:
Blackwell Publishers.
- Streefland, L. (1996), Charming fractions or fractions being
charmed? In T. Nunes and P.E. Bryant (eds.): How Do Children Learn
Mathematics? Hove: Erlbaum.