Alex Holyoake
Posted on Wednesday, 09 July, 2003 - 06:43 pm:

I am getting rather annoyed with the fact that I can't prove that rdrdθ=dxdy

When I do the partial differentations I get dxdx/drdθ-dxdy/drdθ=r

Which is obviously a load of rubbish!

Alex Miller Alex
Posted on Wednesday, 09 July, 2003 - 08:01 pm:

x=rcos(θ) and y=rsin(θ) so
x r =cos(θ),


x θ =-rsin(θ),


y r =sin(θ),

and
y θ =rcos(θ).

On the top row of our det matrix is x r and x θ . On the bottom row of our det matrix is y r and y θ just sub the things in and find the det. It comes out to be cos(θ)×rcos(θ)-sin(θ)×(-rsin(θ)) so r( cos2 (θ)+ sin2 (θ))=r.
Alex Miller Alex
Posted on Wednesday, 09 July, 2003 - 08:06 pm:

However, I am not too clear on your notation. So, if my work was not pertinent to your post, please post back.
Arun Iyer
Posted on Wednesday, 09 July, 2003 - 08:17 pm:

Thinking Geometrically,
dxdy = infinitesimal area

in polar coordinates,
infinitesimal area = (length of arc)*(small change in radius)
=(r×dθ)×(dr)

=r×dr×dθ

love arun