| Brett
Thompson |
Alright I have the following problem. w X (w X r) X is a cross product. w = [wx, wy, wz] (A 3D line in space) r = [rx, ry, rz] (A 3D line in space) I can get this down to the following w(w.r)-r(w.w) (.= dot product) Can someone show me how to simplify this further?? Cheers |
||
| David
Loeffler |
I think w is meant to be [wx , wy , wz ], rather than a vector proportional to [x,y,z]. David |
||
| Sarah
Sarah |
Are you sure it's possible to simplify? The geometrical interpretation of wx(wxr) is more obvious than that of any equivalent expression I can come up with - it's a vector in the same plane as r and w, perpendicular to w, with magnitude IwI2 IrIsinq where q is the angle between w and r. Or, you could say, -IwI2 times the projection of r perpendicular to w. Probably missed something, I usually do.. Does it help to draw some pictures? Love Sarah |
||
| Edwin
Chan |
Brett, here's a ''simplification'' if you can call it that: Direction of turns out to be a vector in the plane of and but antiparallel to (pointing in the opposite direction) you can figure this out by repeated application of the right-hand rule. Furthermore note that if is the angle between and then is the angle between and Magnitude of The magnitude of is where and are the respective magnitudes of and Therefore the magnitude of is |
||
| Edwin
Chan |
Although Sarah's formula is slightly different from mine, I guess what we're both saying is that sometimes it makes for better understanding to consider direction & magnitude separately than to just apply a rote algebraic formula. |