| Arun
Iyer |
Using contour integration, evaluate I am not able to think of a proper contour for this. love arun |
|||
| David
Loeffler |
Try using a long thin rectangle with vertices ±R, ±R + i. David |
|||
| Arun
Iyer |
Thanks David! i got close to the answer but not very close. i got the answer as 2tan(a/2) but my text says (1/a)*tan(a/2) I will put my working here. This is the contour ... ![]() (Sorry for the shabby drawing) Now since the pole z=0 is on real axis,i had to indent the contour by drawing a semi-circle. The only singularity then is which is on the contour, so the integral along the contour Thus the given integral breaks up into six integrals, if we let and , the second, fourth and sixth integrals are zero (if I have not made any mistake). The first and third then get merged. Further simplification gives, Then the comparison of real and imaginary parts gives me the answer. What mistake have I made? love arun |
|||
| Kerwin
Hui |
I get (1/2)tan (a/2) as the answer. You can actually have your contour passing through 0, since the singularity at 0 is removable. There are a couple of mistakes in your calculation: 1. You cannot have your contour passing through a pole. You need to take a small semicircular arc about the point i - and this path has nontrivial contribution to the integral. 2. The question asks for the integral over the nonnegative reals, not the whole real line. Kerwin |
|||
| Arun
Iyer |
When I had to evaluate I had to indent the contour at to evaluate the answer even though it was removable???!!!??? and yes!! i forgot it was over the non-negative reals not the whole real line love arun |
|||
| Demetres
Christofides |
Arun, when you want to evaluate , you integrate over an appropriate contour. This has a pole at 0. Demetres |
|||
| Arun
Iyer |
Oops Sorry!!
![]() Thanks Demetres.(Thanks Kerwin and David) Another Question, How to do .... love arun |
|||
| Kerwin
Hui |
Integrate by parts gives ![]() Kerwin |
|||
| Arun
Iyer |
Smoooooooth!! Thanks Again! love arun |