| James
Lobo |
I was wondering if you could help me prove the following two propositions 1.Show that if A is a countable set and B is a finite set, then A union B is countable. 2.Let S be the set consisting of all finite subsets of the Natural numbers. Prove that S is countable. Thanks |
||||
| Steve
Megson |
To prove countability we need a bijection between the set and a countable set, usually the naturals. For (1), we 'count' B first, then A. We map the first |B| naturals to the elements of B, then map |B|+1 to the first element of A, |B|+2 to the second and so on. Actually we must avoid counting elements of AÃ?????????? B twice, so we map the first |B-A| naturals to elements of B-A, then start mapping to elements of A. A good approach to proving countability of a set of sets is to map each set to a set of prime numbers. We can then map each set of primes to a natural number and so get a bijection from our original set of sets to a subset of the naturals. For (2), we can map a set of naturals to a set of primes by saying that if n is in the set then the nth prime is in the image set. Steve |
||||
| James
Lobo |
For question 1, once we have mapped the first |B-A| naturals to elements of B-A and start mapping to elements of A, what happens next? For questions 2, how does the proof conclude once the nth prime is in the image set? James |
||||
| Steve
Megson |
For (1), assume first that A and B are disjoint, to avoid worrying about counting elements twice. Assume also that A is the natural numbers. Label the elements of B as to . Define a function by This is a bijection, so is countable. If A is not N, we have a bijection from N to A since A is countable. We can extend this to a bijection from to by just mapping to . Now we've shown above that is countable, so we have the result. Now suppose that A and B are not disjoint. Then B-A is a finite set disjoint from A, and so we have proved above that is countable. But , so we have the result. For (2), we define to be the nth prime number, and define a function by (i.e. map X to the product of the primes corresponding to each element of X). This is an injection since the prime factorisation of a number is unique, so only one set can map to agiven number. It isn't a surjection since, for example, no set maps to4. However, an injection is sufficient to prove that S is either finite or countably infinite. S is clearly not finite since for any . Steve |
||||
| James
Lobo |
Thanks Steve very much for your help. |