Well done to Ken from Blessed Robert Johnson Catholic School
who sent us his solution to this problem:
After a while of playing with the numbers on a spreadsheet I
have discovered that the formula to find the "limiting value"
for 2 starting numbers is:
where
is the first number chosen and
is the second number chosen.
The formula to find the "limiting value" for 3 starting numbers will be:
Terence from Brumby Engineering College has made a prediction
for what the limit will be when there are n starting numbers.
He thinks it will be
|
|
where
,
, ...,
and
are the
starting numbers.
Can you see why Terence has made this prediction?
As mathematicians, we like to
prove our
answers, rather than just predict. Here is an outline of how we
might prove the formula when there are two starting
numbers.
Suppose that the first two numbers are
and
. Let's work out the
next few terms of the sequence. We have
|
|
and so on. We'd like to show that in the limit the coefficient of
is
twice the coefficient of
, and also that the sum of these coefficients
is the denominator. Can you see why this will prove the formula?
The
term in the sequence is of the form
(for
). We can work out
in terms of
and
. Can you see how?
We have
(for
). Similarly, we have
(for
).
It turns out that we can use these
formulae to prove that
(for
). Test
this formula on
the above examples to see that it works for these cases.
We'd like to show that as
tends to infinity,
becomes
twice
. Let's think about
. From the
above formula, this is
. But
is getting
bigger and bigger, so the
part of this gets smaller and
smaller. In fact, it tends to
, and so the limit of the whole expression
is
.
It is also possible to use the formulae for
and
to show
that
(for
) (that is, the coefficients of
and
sum to the number on the bottom of the fraction). Again, test this formula
on the examples above.
Combining the last two paragraphs, we find that the limit of the sequence
is
as predicted.