James Dale
Posted on Sunday, 30 May, 2004 - 12:29 pm:

when using the formula

x=(-b± b2 -4ac)/2a

i have no problem solving equations like

2 x2 -5x-4=0

but i do not know how to solve an equation such as:

x2 -5x+6=0

because we usually deal with a x2 +bx+c=0 where a, b and c are numbers but with x2 you are not given a number for a so i cant solve the equation. if it is x2 does the number become 1? please help guys cheers

Michael McLoughlin
Posted on Sunday, 30 May, 2004 - 12:48 pm:

If you wish to use the formula for the equation x2 -5x+6=0 you take a=1, b=-5, c=6. However, this particular equation can be solved in a much easier way since x2 -5x+6 = (x-2)(x-3) = 0. Therefore, x-2=0 or x-3=0 which means that the solutions are x=2 or x=3.
Matthew Buckley
Posted on Sunday, 30 May, 2004 - 02:42 pm:

James, you just think of x2 as 1*x2 (because multiplying anything by 1 doesn't change it's value), so a = 1 in the formula in this instance.

Matt.
Nicola Coles
Posted on Sunday, 30 May, 2004 - 02:47 pm:

x2 = 1 times x2 = 1x2

So x2 -5x+6 = 1x2 -5x+6

So yes, a=1 in this case.
Waqass Farid
Posted on Sunday, 20 June, 2004 - 11:06 pm:

THERE IS MORE THAN ONE WAY OF SOLVING A QUADRATIC EQUATION.
ALTHOUGH YOUR METHOD IS CORRECT IT IS OFTEN EASIER TO USE "COMPLETING THE SQUARE" METHOD WHEN PRESENTED WITH NO QUANTITY BEFORE X SQUARED.
YOU CANNOT ALWAYS USE MICHAELS METHOD WITH EVERY QUADRATIC EQUATION.

WAQ
Matthew Buckley
Posted on Monday, 21 June, 2004 - 12:14 am:

Well technically you can....... you'd just need a heck of a lot of insight generally as to what the factors were though!

Sorry - just me being pedantic!

Matt.
Andrew Fisher
Posted on Monday, 21 June, 2004 - 12:29 am:

Perhaps worth pointing out that using the formula originally given is effectively the same as completeing the square.