| Colin
Foster |
The rules of BIDMAS don't seem sufficient for dealing with this. Many thanks. |
||
| David
Chen |
Interesting Colin, I'm not sure about 2. But I agree with you for 3, it should be the latter one. Since , it differs from . For 1, in my own opinion, you should indicate both roots whenever it needs. I think sqrt(64) only refers to positive sqrt(64), so you can just write 641/2 . But I found that quite a lot people when solving problems, they wrote sqrt(64)=+(-)8, which I think they are wrong. |
||
| Marcos |
When I was doing O-level maths my teacher, when I asked her, said that was the same thing as but I think that this isn't actually the case. means and so can refer to either square root. When you meet complex numbers (if you haven't already) something like is multivalued and we can't order complex numbers (in any useful way) like we can with reals so we can't restrict to ''the positive root(s)''. Marcos |
||
| Ian
Short |
I think David and Marcos have answered all of your queries now as Marcos' message explains (2). |
||
| Ben
Challenor |
My question is pretty similar so I'll post it here. When substituting values into an expression with more than one root in it, eg: ![]() Can you take one root to be positive and one to be negative? Would the above expression have four values or two? |
||
| Marcos |
I assume you're defining to mean either square root (or else your question doesn't make sense). I think there situations where this may be a problem. For example (if you've met complex numbers) a famous paradox is: The paradox is at once resolved if we understand exactly what is meant by the step . For the correct selection of square roots the equality does hold, for example when we choose one to be and the other to be and the LHS is 1 (as we've started off with it being 1). Your mapping is one to many. Usually we aim to deal with many to one (or ideally one to one functions, so that they have inverses) and this can be achieved with your expression if we define to be the positive square root. Perhaps someone can correct me as I'm not entirely sure of my answer, Marcos |
||
| Ben
Challenor |
Using my expression above as an example.. Say x=64. Can you substitute in +8 for the denominator and -8 for the numerator (or vice versa) ? Or do you take root(x) to be the same value throughout? This would 'create' two more solutions. Actually, the above is a bad example, as two of them will be the same. You'd get -9/9 , 7/-7 , -9/-7 , 7/9. |