At what angle would a tower of height h have to lie (relative
to a tangency of the earth) to have maximum viewing distance
around the earth?
Thanks,
Brad
A person at the top of the tower can see
everything that a person lower down can see, draw a diagram.
Basically, this is because if you draw any line segment going
through the middle of the tower, and connect the ends up to the
top of the tower, then assuming that the line segment is not
obstructed, then the triangle formed will not intersect with the
earth, therefore the person at the top can see everything that
the person at the middle can see. Therefore, to maximise the
viewing area of the tower, you need to maximise the viewing area
of a point, which just means maximising the distance from the
surface of the earth, so the tower should point straight upwards
(along the normal vector at the point).
I hope I haven't made a mistake...
That would be my first, intuitive response, but if you draw a
picture, you'll see that a very slight tilt allows one to be at a
tangency coming from a point farther away than the one seen by a
tower straight up.
Actually, when I posted this, I was very tired and thus not able
to think real well. But in the past hour I've been able to come
up with a solution. It, however, takes probably three lines to
write out, you must first change the height of the tower to
another term, and it involves about ten uses of sines. If anyone
wants me to post this, I probably could though. Or, if anyone
thinks that there is a simpler solution that would probably be
easier to use.
Thanks,
Brad
Here's a picture:


What I'm arguing is that everything that anyone at any point on
the tower (e.g. at A or B) can see, can also be seen by someone
at the top of the tower, T. This is because the vision cones for
A and B are contained in the one for T. In other words, in
considering the problem, you only need to consider the top of the
tower T, as an isolated point. Let d be the distance from the top
of the tower to the closest point on the ground (drop a
perpendicular). d< =h, but the area seen increases as d
increases, therefore the maximum value will be when d=h, i.e.
when the tower is normal to the surface of the Earth.
If you have a straight tower and a leaning tower, the leaning
tower will be able to see stuff that the straight tower can't,
but the straight tower will also be able to see stuff the leaning
tower can't, and moreover it will be able to see more stuff that
the leaning tower can't.
Nice diagram eh?
Yeah, I do like the diagram. How did you have it made? You are
right, of course, and you have answered what I asked. But what I
really meant to say (reference to said tiredness) was at what
angle will the person be able to see out considering only one
direction of viewing.
I still have phrased this rather awkwardly, so hopefully someone
can understand it and write it better; if not, I'll have another
go at writing it again.
Brad
I drew it in Adobe Photoshop (you can
download LE for free - limited edition - from
www.adobe.com).
I'll get back to you about your question tomorrow.
You can work in a plane containing the centre of the earth,
the foot of the tower and the direction you want to look...
Now the top of the tower is on a circle of radius h with centre
on the earth's surface (a circle of radius r). The best view is
when the line of sight is the common tangent...
I think that if t is the angle from vertical then
sin(t) = (r-h)/r
My answer is certainly more complicated than that. How did you
formulate that though. I'll go ahead and post my answer, but be
wary...
First, let B be an angle formed by a tower (this will have radius
h) straight up in reference to the line of tangency it is seeing
along (that's the best I could do). Now, let
tan(t)=y/x
Where t is the deviation(for tower of radius r) from a tangency
to the earth.
Through differentials, we can conclude that (if the radius of the
earth is 1) ,
x=1/(1+1/(sin(90-B)(sin(90-B)h+1
Where h can be derived from
r=(x2 +(-x/((sin(90-B)(h+1))+h)2
)1/2
We can also know that
y=-1/((sin(90-B)(h+1))x+h
From this, we can deduce t, albeit only after alot of work.
As I said, I'm sure that a more elegant solution works (most
probably the one posted above me, it's just that I don't
undertsand it well), so I won't take the time to post the
explanation behind all this. If anyone wants to see my method,
I'd be glad to post it; I will try to post a picture to explain
this better.
Brad

That is right (and a lot easier than my method). I've yet to
see if my method will simplify to the above answer, but it would
take a lot of work to find out.
Thanks,
Brad