STEP Specimen Paper 2 Q8


By Anonymous on Wednesday, July 26, 2000 - 08:48 pm :

Alright, I won't kid around. This problem requires a solution and it has been causing my head some trouble. This is a problem from the Cambridge STEP specimen paper and it goes like this:

Prove that (xp -1)/p is greater than or equal to (xq -1)/q.
Where p> q> 0 and 0 < x < 1.


By David Loeffler (P865) on Wednesday, July 26, 2000 - 09:32 pm :

You will have seen the first part of the question which is to explain why a b f(x)dx> a b g(x)dx if a<b and f(x)>g(x) for all x in (a,b) - this is clear from areas.

Note that ( xp -1)/p= 1 x tp dt.

For 0<x<1, xp < xq , so x 1 tp dt< x 1 tp dt.

For these integrals the limits are "the right way round" since x < 1.

But 1 x tp dt=- x 1 tp dt. Thus the required inequality follows.

If this doesn't make sense, sorry - let me know and I'll write it out a bit more clearly.

David


By Anonymous on Thursday, July 27, 2000 - 06:51 pm :

Thanks for the explanation David. However, I guess that I find it difficult to read. Using your method ( or what I can make out of it ), the inequality I end up with gives me an incorrect answer, ( ie:the opposite to what the STEP paper says it should be ). So I would be glad to take you up on your offer of a fuller explanation.


By Kerwin Hui (Kwkh2) on Tuesday, October 24, 2000 - 01:07 pm :

David,

Your method is fine. Just be careful since the question asks for p> q> 0, not p < q, so we obtain the required inequality.

Kerwin