Alright, I won't kid around. This problem requires a solution
and it has been causing my head some trouble. This is a problem
from the
Cambridge STEP specimen paper and it goes like this:
Prove that (xp -1)/p is greater than or equal to
(xq -1)/q.
Where p> q> 0 and 0 < x < 1.
You will have seen the first part of the question which is to explain why òab f(x) dx > òab g(x)dx if a < b and f(x) > g(x) for all x in (a,b) - this is clear from areas.
Note that (xp -1)/p=ò1x tp dt. For 0 < x < 1, xp < xq, so òx1 tp dt < òx1 tp dt. For these integrals the limits are "the right way round" since x < 1. But ò1x tp dt=-òx1 tp dt. Thus the required inequality follows.Thanks for the explanation David. However, I guess that I find it difficult to read. Using your method ( or what I can make out of it ), the inequality I end up with gives me an incorrect answer, ( ie:the opposite to what the STEP paper says it should be ). So I would be glad to take you up on your offer of a fuller explanation.
David,
Your method is fine. Just be careful since the question asks for
p> q> 0, not p < q, so we obtain the required
inequality.
Kerwin