Hi,
A particle of mass m is attached to end A of a light inelastic string AB of length l which is fixed at B. The particle is held with AB horizontal and is prohjected with speed u. Show that the least value of u for the particle to describe complete circles is independent of the direction of projection. Calculate this least value.
I just did this bit more on the question
Using f=ma inward radius, when it is at the top of the
circle,
T + mg = (m.v2 )/r
But T=0 when at max height, so
putting this equation and the one in the last post together you
get u2 =3gl. What have I managed to show? And have I
fully answered the question yet, I suspect not. Please help.
I think you have most of the
ingredients. Just run the problem through logically from
there.
We need the particle to be projected with sufficient energy such
that it reaches a height l above the point B with sufficient
velocity, v, so that the centripetal acceleration (v2
/l) matches the acceleration due to gravity (g).
Take your datum at A and thus total energy as particle projected
at u
E = KE + PE = ½mu2 + 0 =
½mu2
we want the particle to reach B with velocity v such that we have
circular motion, that is so that
mg = mv2 /l as the radius of circle is length of
string
solve for v...
v2 = lg
put into energy expression at top of circle
E = KE+PE = ½mv2 + 2lmg
but we know v2 = lg for circular motion
and thus
E= 2.5 x lmg at top
use conservation of energy to equate E's thus
2.5 x lmg = ½mu2
so u2 = 5lg, independent of mass
To show direction is independent of direction just use the
rotational symmetry of the problem (and I think that they mean
that the particle is projected horizontally).
Hope this helps (& DO CHECK MY ALGEBRA; as a theoretical
physicist it is notoriously bad)
Geoff
It helped very much.
Thank you Geoff.
Hi,
I am getting confused how to set up the equations to answer this
question. I want to answer this question by considering Elastic
Potential Eneregy, Kinetic Energy, and Gravational Potential
Energy.
A particle of mass 0.5kg is attached to one end A of a light elastic string of natural length 2m and modulus 20N. The other end B of the string is fixed to a point on the ceiling. The particle is held at a distance of 1.5m vertically below B and then released.
Calculate (a) the length of the string when the particle reaches its lowest point, (b) the speed of the particle when it passes through its equilibrium position.
Initially the particle has GPE -0.5 x
9.8 x 1.5 relative to B, and no KE nor EPE.
At the lowest point, the string is of length l> 2, the EPE is
(1/2) x (20/2) x (l-2)2 . There are no KE, and the GPE
relative to B is -0.5 x 9.8 x l.
Now equate the energies
-0.5 x 9.8 x 1.5=5(l-2)2 -0.5 x 9.8 x l
So we solve the quadratic to find l (only the root l> 2 is
valid).
Similarly, we work out the equilibrium position for (b), and the
corresponding EPE and GPE. Equate energies again to obtain KE,
and hence the speed of particle at that point.
Kerwin
Thank you Kerwin.
I shall give that a go.
Hi,
I am not sure how to set this situation up and answer. I know how
to do bits of it but not fully.
A particle P of mass m is attached to one end of a light elastic string of natural length l whose other end is attached to a point A on a ceiling. When P hangs in equilibrium AP has length (5l/3).
Show that if P is projected vertically downwards from A with speed (3gl/2)0.5 , P will first come to instantaneous rest after moving a distance (10×l/3).
First, we find the modulus of elasticity of the string:
Tension in the String = Weight of Particle
at equilibrium.
Using Hooke's law
lx/l=m g, but the extension is 2l/3 from the question, so:
Thank you Peter.
I understand your method of approach for this question.
I know it does not matter, but how could we have also used the
fact the we are told that the equilibrium level was (5l/3)?
Also when it asked us the distance it moved till coming to rest,
did it mean from the equlibrium position or the natural length?
Am a little confused on this part. If it wanted us to get 10l/3,
then it must be from the natural length as you said. But I found
this to be a little ambiguos. What do you think? Or am I reading
the question in the wrong context?
Hi Anonymous,
Sorry this is a bit late.
The reason the question told us that the equilibrium length is
5l/3, is so that we can work out the modulus of elasticity,
l.
We needed this to do the rest of the question involving energy.
As far as I know, this is the only use for that
information.
The question wants to know the distance travelled from where the
particle started, to where it was at instantaneous rest.
> Show that if P is projected vertically downwards from A. A
is on the ceiling
This tells us that the particle starts at A, on the ceiling. In
our calculations, we worked out the extension at instantaneous
rest. So the total distance travelled was from the ceiling to the
natural length, when the particle was in free fall, plus the
distance from the natural length to the extension, when it was
being slowed by the elastic string, hence l + 7l/3 = 10l/3
Hope this is clearer,
Peter