STEP 1999 Paper 2 Question 11
By Neil Morrison (P1462) on Thursday,
August 3, 2000 - 07:27 pm :
An automated mobile dummy target for gunnery practice is moving
anti-clockwise around the circumference of a large circle of radius
in a
horizontal plane at a constant angular speed
. A shell is fired from
,
the centre of the circle, with initial speed
and angle of elevation
.
Show that if
, the no matter what the value of
, or what
vertical plane the shell is fired in, the shell cannot hit the target.
[because, of course, the shell cannot travel
, but I'm giving the whole
question;]
Assume now that
and that the shell hits the target
and let
be the angle through which the target rotates between the time
at which the shell is fired and the time of impact. Show that
satisfies the equation:
[I got this just by adding the bits up]
Deduce that there are exactly two possible values of
.
[This is the bit I don't get. Why are there two values? The quadric equation
would have to have its middle SP below the
axis or have the other two
SPs both sitting on the
axis. And the former is not possible as the
constant is < 0.]
Let
and
be the possible values of
and let
and
be the corresponding points of impact. By considering
the quantities
and
or
otherwise show that the linear distance between
and
is
Neil M
By David Loeffler (P865) on Thursday,
August 3, 2000 - 10:58 pm :
Well, I suppose that the quartic can be regarded as a quadratic in
.
This will have either two, or zero, positive roots since the constant term is
positive. In fact, it has exactly two, because
, so the minimum is
less than the minimum of
. Thus there are two distinct positive values of
, giving rise to two
distinct positive (and two negative) roots of the quartic.
Hope this helps.
David
By Neil Morrison (P1462) on Friday,
August 4, 2000 - 10:18 am :
I think I had got to that stage, but I was trying to win the logic battle. But
the problem is it says exactly two possible values. And in your solution, we
have 2 positive and 2 negative, the negative ones (say
and
) can be
regarded as
and
. The only way I could resolve this is
to show that the "
" values end up being equal to the original
positive values, so in effect there are only two distinct solutions.
Thanks anyway
Neil M
By David Loeffler (P865) on Friday,
August 4, 2000 - 01:55 pm :
That would actually be impossible, surely, since
is transcendental? But
the physical situation implies that we're not looking for "position" angles
which are mod
, but for the angle the target has actually moved through.
This will not be mod
as, for example,
would correspond to one
and a half circuits, not to half a circuit. The target won't turn around and
go backwards, so perhaps that is why we can discard the negative solutions.
By Neil Morrison (P1462) on Friday,
August 4, 2000 - 04:43 pm :
But the net position of the target will be the same after
as if it had
moved
backwards.
However, I agree that this will not work. It was the only way I
could think of to justify the question. I think its badly
worded.
Neil M