The Gamma Function
By Niranjan Srinivas on Wednesday, January
16, 2002 - 04:41 pm:
I have been reading a lot of high mathematics lately and i am
getting a bit confused...
so here goes !
1) What is the 't' in the definition of the gamma function stand
for ?
2) What precisely is the relationship between the zeta and the
gamma functions ?
3) With respect to the Gamma function, f(x) = x.f(x-1)
how is this proved ?
4)Because of 3) ,the gamma function is used to compute factorials
of non intgral and negative numbers. HOW ? (to some extent i know
this,but am not totally clear)
5) I have this major doubt...in the definition of the zeta
function, how are 1s , 2s ,etc defined when
s is complex ? Does it mean that 1 is multiplied by itself an
imaginary number of times?
Please answer these questions...
and please remember that I do NOT KNOW much calculus.
Also,please provide one to one answers,instead of suggesting more
material - which is what,to some extent,confused me.
THANKS
cheers
Niranjan
By Yatir Halevi on Wednesday, January 16,
2002 - 05:27 pm:
Niranjan,
About the Gamma function:
here is a little history:
Consider the following integral:
Where
is a certain integer. and
is the variable (your
) When we try to integrate it we get the most interesting result. We integrate it using the following integral formula:
Where
and
are two functions,
is the derivative of
, and
is the derivative of
.
Let's choose:
so,
so,
So we get:
as
tends to
tends to 0. Let's define
We get
Or we can generalize:
Now we only have to answer what is
So our integral is really equal to
Now, the gamma function is defined as the following:
An interesting result is:
Hope it helped.
If you don't understand it, don't hesitate to ask.
Yatir
By Arun Iyer on Wednesday, January 16,
2002 - 06:12 pm:
I think Yatir has answered everything quite
appropriately
However,for the last question you have posed about zeta
function...
check this site
as you have mentioned you need no extra material,you may just
read the first para which quite gives you the answer...
love arun
By Gavin Adams on Wednesday, January 16,
2002 - 06:14 pm:
To answer your questions (i hope i can
):
1) What is the 't' in the definition of the gamma function stand
for ?
I assume you mean the definition as:
of the gamma function
The "t" doesn't stand for anything really...
2) What precisely is the relationship between the zeta and the
gamma functions ?
I think there are quite a few, but one is:
3) wrt gamma function, f(x) = x.f(x-1)
how is this proved > ?
Yatir proved this
4) Because of 3) ,the gamma function is used to compute
factorials of non intgral and negative numbers. HOW ? (to some
extent i know this,but am not totally clear)
You can pretty much just plug in non-integers for "x" in the
definition above, but there is a way to
''transform this into a well known gaussian integral'' (whatever that means)
to find that
5) I have this major doubt...in the definition of the zeta
function, how are 1s , 2s ,ertc defined when s is complex ? Does
it mean that 1 is multiplied by itself an imaginary number of
times?
Yes i agree, this makes about as much sense as
does
but it has to do with the same idea: the function i gave above (that relates
and
) can be extended to accept complex arguments.
By George Walker on Thursday, January 17,
2002 - 02:15 pm:
I would kinda like to solve the Riemann hypothesis....would do
wonders for the start of one's maths career
By Philip Ellison on Thursday, January 17,
2002 - 04:49 pm:
And earn you a million dollars in the process!
By David Loeffler on Thursday, January 17,
2002 - 07:07 pm:
I have yet to meet a mathematician who
wouldn't want to solve it :-)