By Brad Rodgers on Wednesday, August 28,
2002 - 09:24 pm:
Is there a closed form evaluation for
,
for integer n in general? I can easily evaluate it for individual
n, but I don't see the pattern...
Brad
By Yatir Halevi on Wednesday, August 28,
2002 - 11:01 pm:
I don't know if it helps,
but
seems to
have a connection to:
which equals to:
although I can't pin-point it yet,
Yatir
By Brad Rodgers on Thursday, August 29,
2002 - 01:58 am:
It appears that (from your work, Yatir)
,
and I'll have a go at proving this. There's obviously a link
between this and the original integral, but in the latter, a
rational term appears that I just can't seem to determine.
(Of course, if anyone proves this, and makes a decent conjecture
about the rational term, it'd be fairly easy to prove by
induction; the problem is making the decent conjecture)
Brad
By Ian Short on Thursday, August 29,
2002 - 10:39 am:
Sorry to butt in- Possibly by substituting
into
it becomes clear how to evaluate the integral
in the previous message.
Ian
By Michael Doré on Thursday, August 29, 2002 -
04:37 pm:
Also, for the original integral
you can derive a reduction formula.
Write
. So:
Integrate the second term by parts taking
and
, i.e.
. This gives
i.e.