Proof of the Chain Rule
By Louise Johnson on Wednesday, September
19, 2001 - 09:00 pm:
Where can I find the proof that dy/dx can be treated as a
fraction?
By David Loeffler on Monday, October 01,
2001 - 09:56 am:
It can't. You have to prove the chain rule by entirely
different methods; although the initial premises and the end
result may look like you've treated it as a fraction, in
fact you haven't. If that makes sense.
David
By Louise Johnson on Friday, October 05,
2001 - 07:21 pm:
It does. Thankyou. Still where can I find the proof?
By Tristan Marshall on Thursday, October
11, 2001 - 03:34 pm:
Ok, here goes:
If
define
as: the limit as
of:
You should have seen this definition before. The key is the precise meaning
of 'limit'. Here it means that, for a given value of
, the above
expression can be made as close as we like to
. (This is, roughly,
the precise definition of 'limit')
More precisely, given
, we can find
such that the
above expression is within
of
.
From now on I'll write
for
etc.
Ok, now for the proof:
Let
,
. We want to prove that
Let
be a change in
, and
and
be the
corresponding changes in
and
.
By playing around with the limit expression above, we get:
where
depends on
and
and
as
.
Similarly for
:
where, as before,
as
.
Combining this with the expression for
, we have:
NOTE: This expression is EXACT, once
and
have been
found, and these are uniquely defined by the value of
.
So now divide both sides by
and let
. We get:
I hope that helps.
By Louise Johnson on Tuesday, October 30,
2001 - 10:53 pm:
wonderful