By Woon Khang Tang (P3742) on Wednesday, April 25,
2001 - 08:10 pm: If
, then
will be
. I know that by
using first principles, there's a pattern, but how to prove that it's true for
all real values of
?
By Geoff Milward (Gcm24) on Wednesday, April 25, 2001
- 10:16 pm: For
real we have to define what we mean by
. From my first year analysis I think I recall
is defined to be
for
real. You now have to show that
I guess you then expand then now expanding
for small
.
It is considerably easier for
integer as one can just expand out
, but I guess this is what you already knew.
I think the real difficulty here is the formal definition of
for
real.
Hope this helps
Geoff M.