By Archishman Ghosh on Monday, July 22, 2002 - 07:16 pm:
I need some help with these problems. Evaluate 1) limx®p/4 (tan 2x)tan x
(x in radians)
2) evaluate integral of
[x2]dx/[(x-14)2] + [x2] from 0 to 14
here [x] denotes the largest integer less than or equal to x.
By Ian Short on Thursday, July 25, 2002 - 01:05 pm: Hi Archishman,
Sorry for delay, I've been away.
(1) I will look at the limit x ®p/4 with x < p/4. This is because
for x slightly greater than p/4, tan(2x) < 0 and then we have a
negative number to the power of tan(x). We could look at that later, but
discuss just limit from below for now.
tan(2x) ®¥and tan(x) ®1 as x ®p/4. This indicates that
(tan(2x))tan(x) also tends to ¥.
To show this rigorously, restrict to x suitably near p/4 that tan(x)
is greater than 1/2 then note tan(2x)tan x > tan(2x)1/2. The right
hand side shoots off to ¥ as x approaches p/4, hence the left
hand side does likewise.
(2) This is your integral?
ò014[x2]/([(x-14)2]+[x2])dx
Set,
I = ò014[x2]/([(x-14)2]+[x2])dx
J = ò014[(x-14)2]/([(x-14)2]+[x2])dx
I think I=J by setting y=x-7 in I and y=7-x in J. Note also
I+J=ò014dx=14.
So I=7.
Ian
By Archishman Ghosh on Saturday, July 27, 2002 - 07:00 pm:
Dear Ian,
I am so sorry, I actually typed the wrong limit problem. The problem that I
wanted to give is
limx®p/2tan xtan 2x
This is of the form infinity to the power zero.How do you do this?
By Ian Short on Monday, July 29, 2002 - 11:35 am: Well that's okay. Here are the essentials:
# Once again I'll look at the real limit from below, that is x < p/2 for
the same reason as before.
# Set y=\p/2-x so that we are looking for the limit of tan(y)tan(2y)
as y approaches 0 from above.
# Roughly speaking, tan(y) ~ y and tan(2y) ~ 2y near the origin so the
limit is essentially that of y2y which is 1.
# y2y=e2y log(y) and y log(y) ®0 as y ®0 from above (need
any help showing this?)
# To elaborate on the 'roughly speaking' part you could show that for
a, b > 0, (ay)by ®1 as y tends to 0 from above and sandwich
tan ytan 2y between two such limits. E.g. y4y < tan ytan2y < (2y)2y for small enough positive y.
Is that enough? Is that clear? Tell me if any problems,
Ian
By Archishman Ghosh on Monday, July 29, 2002 - 06:16 pm: Ian,
forgive me if I am being stupid ,but when you put y=p/2-x, y® 0 so
y2y is something like 00.
Could you just elaborate how does its limit tend to 1?
By Ian Short on Monday, July 29, 2002 - 07:39 pm: Hi!
# Archishman: The line after I first wrote y2y is meant to explain why
the limit is 1. I'll be more explicit here:
For POSITIVE y, y2y=e2y log y. Now y log y ® 0 as y ® 0
((set y=e-z then y ® 0 equivalent to z ®¥and
y log y = -z/ez ® 0 )) Hence y2y ® e2×0 = 1.
Tell me how you go......
Ian