By Archishman Ghosh on Monday, July 22, 2002 - 07:16 pm:

I need some help with these problems.

Evaluate

1) limx®p/4 (tan 2x)tan x

(x in radians)

2) evaluate integral of

[x2]dx/[(x-14)2] + [x2] from 0 to 14

here [x] denotes the largest integer less than or equal to x.


By Ian Short on Thursday, July 25, 2002 - 01:05 pm:

Hi Archishman,

Sorry for delay, I've been away.

(1) I will look at the limit x ®p/4 with x < p/4. This is because for x slightly greater than p/4, tan(2x) < 0 and then we have a negative number to the power of tan(x). We could look at that later, but discuss just limit from below for now.

tan(2x) ®¥and tan(x) ®1 as x ®p/4. This indicates that (tan(2x))tan(x) also tends to ¥.

To show this rigorously, restrict to x suitably near p/4 that tan(x) is greater than 1/2 then note tan(2x)tan x > tan(2x)1/2. The right hand side shoots off to ¥ as x approaches p/4, hence the left hand side does likewise.

(2) This is your integral? ò014[x2]/([(x-14)2]+[x2])dx

Set,

I = ò014[x2]/([(x-14)2]+[x2])dx

J = ò014[(x-14)2]/([(x-14)2]+[x2])dx

I think I=J by setting y=x-7 in I and y=7-x in J. Note also I+J=ò014dx=14.

So I=7.

Ian


By Archishman Ghosh on Saturday, July 27, 2002 - 07:00 pm:

Dear Ian,

I am so sorry, I actually typed the wrong limit problem. The problem that I wanted to give is

limx®p/2tan xtan 2x

This is of the form infinity to the power zero.How do you do this?


By Ian Short on Monday, July 29, 2002 - 11:35 am:

Well that's okay. Here are the essentials:

# Once again I'll look at the real limit from below, that is x < p/2 for the same reason as before.

# Set y=\p/2-x so that we are looking for the limit of tan(y)tan(2y) as y approaches 0 from above.

# Roughly speaking, tan(y) ~ y and tan(2y) ~ 2y near the origin so the limit is essentially that of y2y which is 1.

# y2y=e2y log(y) and y log(y) ®0 as y ®0 from above (need any help showing this?)

# To elaborate on the 'roughly speaking' part you could show that for a, b > 0, (ay)by ®1 as y tends to 0 from above and sandwich tan ytan 2y between two such limits. E.g. y4y < tan ytan2y < (2y)2y for small enough positive y.

Is that enough? Is that clear? Tell me if any problems,

Ian


By Archishman Ghosh on Monday, July 29, 2002 - 06:16 pm:

Ian,

forgive me if I am being stupid ,but when you put y=p/2-x, y® 0 so y2y is something like 00.

Could you just elaborate how does its limit tend to 1?


By Ian Short on Monday, July 29, 2002 - 07:39 pm:

Hi!

# Archishman: The line after I first wrote y2y is meant to explain why the limit is 1. I'll be more explicit here:

For POSITIVE y, y2y=e2y log y. Now y log y ® 0 as y ® 0 ((set y=e-z then y ® 0 equivalent to z ®¥and y log y = -z/ez ® 0 )) Hence y2y ® e2×0 = 1.

Tell me how you go......

Ian