In a calculus book I am reading, either I have
lost several pages or it doesn't explain what Inx means, but
either way I am stuck. Anyway, what does "In" mean. I have picked
up from the use of it that if Inx=y, then x=ey , but other than this I am confused.
Could someone tell me what In is and how to use it in
differentiation?
Thanks,
Brad
It's not In, but rather ln (ie
a lowercase l, rather than an uppercase i). The function you're
talking about is called the logarithm, which is where the l comes
from. The n refers to natural, since it's related to the e
function.
So what's it all about then? First, I'll assume you know what
ey means, since you mention it. If not, let me know.
So if x=ey , we want to be able to write y= something.
Thing is, there's no suitable way of doing this using only + - x
/ ^ ! etc (the normal operations), so we introduce the function
ln. If you like, you can think of it as shorthand: y=ln(x) simply
means x=ey .
If you're not confused already, now consider x=10y .
In this case, we'd probably write y=log(x), where the log stands
for logarithm to base 10 . Base here
simply means which number we're taking the power of. Now
10y and ey are generally not the same, so
log(x) and ln(x) are not the same function. You can use other
bases but there are good reasons why these are the only two
considered. It is always possible to specify the logarithm to any
base in terms of the logarithm to any other base.
To figure out any properties of log (which hold for any base),
you need to reverse things. Think of what ex does.
Well, ex xey = e(x+y) . That
means ln(xy)=ln(x) + ln(y). And so on.
Finally, to differentiate you can again consider things the other
way around.
x=ey so 1=ey x dy/dx, which we can rewrite
as dy/dx=1/x.
Note that x-1 is the only power of x we couldn't
integrate before introducing logarithms, so it's very helpful to
be able to do this.
Hope that helps.
-Dave
So far, I understand what you've said.
However, my book goes farther to say that if y=ax ,
then lny=xlna. This has me confused first by its missing
introduction, and then by the fact that it says the derivitive of
y=exlna is lna exlna . It would seem to me
that if the derivitive of ex is ex , then
that of exlna would be exlna . How does one
get either of these results.
Confused,
Brad
I am still not sure how to obtain the result
in the first three lines in your post. I get from my own work on
this that ax =eeax . I have a feeling I may
be wrong though. If you don't see how I got this, I can try to
explain it. I think what I don't see is how a=elna .
In your post you used xa which I didn't know from
where it came- this may be my problem. Anyway, I think I
understood the bottom part of your of your post.
Less confused,
Brad
It is just the definition of
ln, that Dave gave above.
We say y = lnx if ey = x, so it follows by definition
that elnx = x or indeed that ln(e^x)=x.
Think of lnx as the inverse function to ex , just like
sqrtx is the inverse of x2 (so compare the above
results to (sqrtx)2 =x and sqrt(x2
)=x.
Thanks, I believe I am understanding ln
better. You have shown quite well all of the different steps to
be taken.Thanks once again.
Not confused,
Brad