Cos(m) Irrational


By Yatir Halevi on Friday, September 27, 2002 - 02:34 pm:

How do you prove that cos(m) is irrational for all natural m?

Yatir


By Julian Pulman on Sunday, September 29, 2002 - 05:27 pm:

Okay, I think I worked a proof - it's largely inspired by Theorem 49 in "An Introduction to the Theorem of Numbers". I've got a few sheets of working here, so I'll try to shorten it a little - apologies for any loss of clarity in doing so.


Define f(x)=[(m-x )2n ( m2 -(m-x )2 )n-1 ]/(n-1)!

A quick check shows that

0<f(x)< m4n-2 /(n-1)! for 0<x<m ...(1)

Now define G(x)=f(x)-f''(x)+ f(4) (x)-- f(4n-2) (x), where f(k) is the kth derivative of f.

f(x)=G''(x)+G(x)

Multiply both sides by sinx, and integrate the lefthand side

d/dx[G'(x)sinx-G(x)cosx]=G''(x)sinx+G(x)sinx=f(x)sinx

Therefore, 0 m f(x)sinxdx=G'(m)sinm-G(m)cosm+G(0) ...(2)

(i) f is a polynomial in (m-x )2 , so G'(m)=0.

(ii) Clearly from (i) and f's definition we can show that f(2k) (m) is an integer G(m) is an integer.

(iii) Inspection with some common sense reveals G(0) to also be an integer.

Therefore, if cosm is rational - assume cosm=p/q - then q 0 m f(x)sinxdx is an integer

Recall (1), and note that sinx is always less than or equal to 1. Because of this, multiply the RHS of (1) by 1 and integrate between the limits specified by (2). Take the modulus and we're left with:

|q 0 m f(x)sinxdx|<dm.( m4n-2 /(n-1)!)

Let n get arbitrarily large, then dm.( m4n-2 /(n-1)!)<1, and the LHS cannot be an integer. Contradiction, our assumption that cosm was rational for m0 was incorrect.
Julian


By Yatir Halevi on Tuesday, October 01, 2002 - 11:59 am:

Yes, thanks Julian.
I just wonder how people even think of trying function like f(x)...?

Yatir