Sin(pi/10) as a surd expression
By Graham Johnson (T4733) on Thursday,
June 7, 2001 - 06:58 pm :
Can anyone help with this?
Give sin(pi/10) as a surd expression, using the expansion of
sin5x
I tried de Moivre, equating real and imaginary parts etc, but
could only get as far as a polynomial in sin4 x, hence
an expresion for sin2 x.
Thank you,
Graham Johnson
By Kerwin Hui (Kwkh2) on Thursday,
June 7, 2001 - 09:15 pm :
Well, we have
As
, we have a quintic for
, i.e.
and
is the least positive root.
Now, we know one of the factor is
(which is not what we are interested).
So we obtain, upon long division,
i.e.
i.e.
i.e.
i.e.
Now we are only interested in the positive root, which is
.
An alternative way, which does not require expansion of
but does
require De Moivre's is first to consider
(by the fifth root of
unity), and then apply the formulae
and
and get to the same answer, but it is slightly more messy.
Kerwin
By Brad Rodgers (P1930) on Thursday,
June 7, 2001 - 10:20 pm :
Alternatively, one can use a geometric approach to prove that
sin(pi/10)=(sqrt(5)-1)/4
In the following picture of a half pentagon and two auxilary
lines, note that

h2 +(1+x)2 =(2+x)2 (1)
and
h2 +1=x2 (2)
Adding (1) and (2)
(1+x)2 -1=(2+x)2 -x2
Expanding and using the quadratic, we get (remember x is
positive) x=51/2 +1. As angle y=pi /10,
sin(y)=
sin(pi /10)=1/(51/2 +1)=(51/2 -1)/4
I'll leave you to prove some of the angle relationships in the
pentagon that allow us to do this.
Brad
By Brad Rodgers (P1930) on Friday, June
8, 2001 - 01:04 am :
Sorry, I forgot to label angle y; in the triangle with sides
h, 1, and x, it is the angle opposite of 1.
Brad
By Graham Johnson (T4733) on Saturday,
June 9, 2001 - 07:56 am :
Thank you very much for the responses.
However...
I got the problem wrong, we were supposed to use the expansion of
cos5x.
would this change the approach or at least the method of solving
the resulting polynomial? I ask because the problem is seen in A
Level texts, and I can't see that the approach used above to
solve the quartic is within A Level syllabi?
Many thanks again,
Graham
By Kerwin Hui (Kwkh2) on Saturday,
June 9, 2001 - 02:50 pm :
Well, here is a way to do this:
Now
so
but we know that
, so we must have
which we recognise as a quadratic in
. Solving, we see that
but we know
, so we must have
Now
, so we have
.
Kerwin