Exact Values of Trigonometric Functions


By Graeme Mcrae on Sunday, December 30, 2001 - 09:30 am:

I need some help.

I'm making a page for my website, mcraefamily.com/MathHelp/GeometrySpecialAngles.htm , which gives the exact values of the sine of various angles.


As every high school student learns, sin30°=1/2, and
sin45°=   ___
Ö1/2
 

, etc.

Also, every high school student learns the formulas for sines of sums of angles.

For example,
sin75° = sin45° cos30° + cos45 °sin30° =   ___
Ö3/8
 
+   ___
Ö1/8
 

Perhaps the high school students don't know that Ptolemy discovered that
sin36° =
Ö
 

5/8-Ö5/8
 

. Of course, he didn't express it in those terms; instead he invoked the golden ratio, but in modern terms, this is what he discovered.

Using this result, and the half-angle formula, a rich selection of exact trig functions can be represented.

For example, with a little calculation it is easy to discover that
sin54°=
Ö
 

3/8+Ö5/8
 

.

I'm getting to the part where I need help...



Ö
 

3/8+Ö5/8
 

is not fully simplified. It can be further simplified as


  ____
Ö5/16
 
+1/4

, or even more simply,

(Ö5+1)/4, which Ptolemy would tell you is just half the golden ratio.

But how is a person to recognize that

Ö
 

3/8+Ö5/8
 

is not fully simplified?

The reason I ask is that I calculated exact representations of sin84° - - one is


  æ
Ö

9/32+   __
Ö45
 
/32
 
+
Ö
 

5/32-Ö5/32
 

and the other is


  æ
 ú
Ö

7/16+Ö5/16+   æ
Ö

15/128+   __
Ö45
 
/128
 
 



Both are quite correct; the first looks a bit simpler than the second; however I fear there may be lurking just beyond my reach a far simpler representation of this same value.

It gets worse.

To find sin3°, I use the half angle formula, which gives me


  æ
 ú
Ö

1/2-   æ
Ö

9/128+   __
Ö45
 
/128
 
-
Ö
 

5/128-Ö5/128
 
 

I checked my work, and this is, in fact, an exact representation of sin3°, but I have no way of knowing if a simpler representation exists.
Can anyone help me? Thanks in advance.


By Yatir Halevi on Sunday, December 30, 2001 - 12:42 pm:

You might want to accept it or not (I know I wouldn't), but using my computer i simplified (So, I have no proof)
sin84 to:



Ö
 

5/32 - Ö5/32
 
+   __
Ö15
 
/8 + Ö3/8



sin3 to:

  æ
Ö

-
Ö
 

5/128-Ö5/129
 
-   __
Ö15
 
/16-Ö3/16+1/2
 


Yatir
By Graeme Mcrae on Sunday, December 30, 2001 - 06:13 pm:

Thank you, Yatir.

You're right, I am reluctant to take such things on faith, or on the authority of others. But luckily, I can verify that the formulas you provided are in perfect agreement with the (more complex) formulas I derived on my own. Moreover, the simplification you provided gives me insight into a possible method of simplifying such expressions.

In this case, I calculated


my sin84
=   æ
Ö

9/32+   __
Ö45
 
/32
 
+
Ö
 

5/32-Ö5/32
 

your sin84
=   __
Ö15
 
/8+Ö3/8+
Ö
 

5/32-Ö5/32
 


If both are true (or at least if they are equal to one another) then


  __
Ö15
 
/8+Ö3/8=   æ
Ö

9/32+   __
Ö45
 
/32
 


The best way to verify this is to square the left side, then take its square root.

In other words, if

leftside = rightside

then


  _________
Öleftside2
 
=rightside

So let's square
  __
Ö15
 
/8+Ö3/8

, then take its square root:


  æ
Ö

(   __
Ö15
 
/8+Ö3/8)2
 
=


  æ
Ö

15/64+2   __
Ö45
 
/64+3/64
 
=


  æ
Ö

9/32+   __
Ö45
 
/32
 


Once you show me the simplified expression, I can use this method to verify that it is identical to my needlessly complex expression.

However, I still find it difficult to simplify such expressions. Looking back on this one, I can see how it could be done...

Clearly, in this case,
9/32+   __
Ö45
 
/32

is a ''perfect square'' - - the square of
  __
Ö15
 
/8+Ö3/8

. To simplify the of the former expression, I need a method to recognize such perfect squares. Not just a method, but a constructive method: I would like to find its square root.
Toward that end I see that


(Öa+Öb)2 = a+b+2   __
Öa b
 

, where a and b are rational numbers. At this point, I conjecture that the rational and irrational parts of such a sum can be ßeparated" so that the rational part is a+b, and the real part is
2   __
Öa b
 

.

Applying this, if
9/32+   __
Ö45
 
/32

is a perfect square, then


9/32+   __
Ö45
 
/32 = a+b+2   __
Öa b
 

That means
  __
Ö45
 
/32 = 2   __
Öa b
 

So
  __
Ö45
 
/64 =   __
Öa b
 

So 45/4096 = a b

And a+b=9/32

Solving these two equations for a and b, I get

a=3/64, and b=15/64 (or vice versa)

And sure enough, the square of
  ____
Ö3/64
 
+   _____
Ö15/64
 

is
9/32+   __
Ö45
 
/32

- - - -

Let's see if

Ö
 

5/32-Ö5/32
 

can be simplified this way. If the expression inside the
  
Ö
 

is a perfect square then

5/32-Ö5/32 = (Öa-Öb)2


5/32-Ö5/32 = a+b-2   __
Öa b
 

So a+b=5/32

and 4a b=5/1024

Alas, a and b are not rational numbers;

a=(5+2Ö5)/64, and b=(5-2Ö5)/64 (or vice versa).
So I can't use this method to further simplify sin84.

Again, thanks for your help, I really appreciate it.


By Yatir Halevi on Sunday, December 30, 2001 - 08:42 pm:

You Welcome,
Hope it helped.

Yatir