I have tried for awhile to get this problem without success.
"An ellipse is drawn with major and minor axes of lengths 10 and
8 respectively. Using one focus as center, a circle is drawn that
is tangent to the ellipse, with no part of the circle being
outsdie the ellipse. Compute the radius of the circle"
One method of using the definition of an ellipse (the focii
definition) came up with one focus= (root 18, 0), While common
sense tells me when x=0, the focus clearly must =3 since the sum
of the distances from the focii is ten and you are splitting
this, so you have 3,4,5 triangle.
I also noted that you have an inscriptable quadrilateral formed
by the origin, a minor axes point, the center of the circle (the
focus), and the point of tangency. Would that be right? I am
wondering if you could use any theorems then such as Ptolemys
which I can't remember...
Thanks for your help!
Well, the foci are certainly 3 units
either side of the centre on the long axis; I think you must have
got an extra factor of 2 from somewhere in your calculation. Your
common sense is quite correct.
As for the circle, it's really not as difficult as it might seem:
the circle you want is tangent to the ellipse at the endpoint of
the major axis.

Can you prove that this circle lies wholly within the ellipse?
(You'll need the triangle inequality.)
David
(An interesting question to ask next is
the size of the largest circle tangent to the ellipse at the end
of the major axis which is wholly contained within the ellipse. I
think the largest one in this case has radius 16/5, and generally
b2 /2a where the ellipse has axes a and b. (a>
b).

David
if you find it difficult to find the foci then go along these
simple steps...

love arun
if you want to solve the problem algebraically,then you can go
further ahead as follows....
1> find the equation of the line normal to the ellipse and
passing through focus(3,0) or (-3,0) as you may wish..
2> find the intersection point of the line with the
ellipse...
3> use distance formula to determine the radius..
love arun
Arun, if you do that you then have no
guarantee that the circle lies wholly within the ellipse - it is
still necessary to prove that separately.
David
David,
Did you get the answer b2 /a (a,b semimajor and
semiminor axes resp.) by equating curvatures?
Kerwin
David,
i can't quite understand your dilemma...
i am trying to find a point on the ellipse such that the normal
to ellipse passing through focus and that point is also normal to
the circle...
for this i find the slope of the tangent to ellipse at point say
(x1,y1) then slope of normal to ellipse to the ellipse will be
negative reciprocal of that slope....
then i will use the condition that the line is passing through
(3,0) and find (x1,y1) and voila that's it???
please do correct me if i am wrong anywhere??
love arun
Arun, that method is guaranteed to find
a circle tangent to the ellipse and having the right centre; but
what's to stop us getting something like this:

Remember that the question said:
"Using one focus as center, a circle is drawn that is tangent to
the ellipse, with no part of the circle being outside the
ellipse."
The circle in the image above is tangent to the ellipse, yet it
does not lie wholly inside it.
In fact this can't happen - my circle isn't centred at a focus of
the ellipse - but you have to prove that it won't happen.
This is what is missing from your method.
By the way - Kerwin, I did find that result by equating
curvatures, then proved it by parametrizing the ellipse to ensure
that this circle really is inside the ellipse (and that no larger
one is so).
David
David,
Now,i got your point!!
Well,
i just have an idea..thoughhhhhh...
focus of the ellipse is (ae,0)
this is our center and if i am not wrong then the radius of the
circle we get must be (a-ae)
so we can write the equation of the circle as
(x-ae)2 +y2 =(a-ae)2
.....(1)
we know the equation of the elipse is,
(x2 /a2 )+(y2 /b2
)=1....(2)
also b2 =a2 (1-e2 )
if we solve (1) and (2) simultneously and if we get one and only
one point as the intersection point then the circle must lie
wholly inside the ellipse and if we get more than one point as
the intersection point then the circle doesn't lie wholly inside
the ellipse...
i am not sure how far i am correct???
please do correct me if i am wrong??
love arun
Well, we could have only one point of
intersection if the circle lay wholly outside the ellipse
(except the one point of tangency). For example the circle with
radius a+ae and centre (ae,0) which is tangent at the other end.
However this clearly won't happen in this case (the circle you
mention clearly includes at least some points inside the
ellipse).
David
do you mean the proof is incomplete???
love arun
What I mean is that the proof is
incomplete as it stands, but a minor extra statement - that the
circle clearly does not lie entirely outside the ellipse - is all
you need to make it so.
David
David,
Sorry to trouble you but i can't see what you are getting
at???
please,could you explain it a bit??
love arun
Sorry, I'm not explaining myself well
here, perhaps. In your message posted 6.58 Thursday, you suggest
that we could prove that the circle centre (ae,0) and radius a-ae
is the required circle by solving its equation simultaneously
with that of the ellipse; if this gave only one solution, the
circle must be wholly inside the ellipse, and is thus the one the
original question asked for.
What I am trying to say is that this proof is incomplete as it
stands: if we get only one solution for x when solving the
equations simultaneously, it could mean that the circle lies
within the ellipse, or it could mean it lies entirely outside it.
However, the second case clearly won't occur for this circle,
since it obviously doesn't lie entirely outside the ellipse.
Hence, if we find only one solution for x, it does follow that
the circle lies within the ellipse.
David
Oh!!yeah!!
thanks for the explanation,David....
BTW,in your earlier posts you have mentioned about the proof by
triangle inequality...
could you show me the proof please???
love arun
Wow!!
it looks pretty neat...
love arun