Volumes and areas of inspheres and
incircles
By Stuart Ocock :
Why is it that those plane figures which have 'area =
perimeter' have an incircle of radius 2, and why is it that in 3D
the objects with 'volume = surface area' have an insphere of
radius 3? Is the fact that the radius = dimension significant?
Must the objects be convex?
By sk269 on July 29, 1998
:
It can be proved that, if an 'insphere' of a polyhedron
exists which touches ALL the faces of the polyhedron, then the polyhedron
must be convex. The corresponding results can be proved in the plane and
in
dimensions.
Suppose
is a plane polygon (not necessarily regular) with an incircle
(assuming this means a circle that touches ALL sides of the polygon). Now
suppose that
satisfies ''area=perimeter''. Take a typical side of
of
length
and let the incircle have radius
.

For the single triangle as illustrated we have
area
, length contributing to perimeter
.
Adding over all triangles, we get
so
.
The radius of the incircle is indeed the dimension of the space.
In 3 dimensions, for example, we 'replace' the formula
by
[consider the formula for the volume of a pyramid] so the
'proof' becomes
(where
is the (variable) area of a typical face)
hence
.
You need
-dimensional geometry to prove in general but it is true that in
all dimensions the radius of the incircle is the dimension of the space.
The relationship between the radius of the insphere and the dimension applies
more generally and not just to objects for which 'area = perimeter' or
'volume = surface area' etc. Stated more generally for an
dimensional
'polyhedron' this is:
Radius of
dimensional 'insphere'
'volume' of polyhedron/
'surface area' of polyhedron