In the figure below, where r is the radius of the circle, b is
1/2 the base of the isosceles triangle and A is the area in
green, how does one find what the base of the triangle is?

I have used integrals to get far enough to realize that the
equation set up will be
| A= |
1 2 | r2(q-sinq) |
I am trying to solve for b, which is what you were looking for
as well. A and r are constants. I am still not sure how to solve
for b either though. But, I have little experience in
trigonometry.
Anyways, it is interesting that when we define the angle opposite
to the base of the triangle to be B, we can find the area to
be
A=B/360 x pi x r2 -b x sqrt(r2
-b2 )
As this is the same area defined in the previous formula, we can
substitute and reach the conclusion that
sin((1/2 -B/360)pi)=sqrt(r2 -1/4 x L2
)/r
Where L is the base of an iscosceles triangle, r the other sides
and B is the angle opposite to L.
Sorry if this last part has been useless. Does anyone know how to
solve for b in my first equation given A and r?
Thanks,
Brad
Brad - if you go back to David's equation:
| q = |
3 æ Ö |
12A/r2 |
| b= |
1 2 | rq = |
3 æ Ö |
3/2×A r |
Michael
Thanks, has anyone ever compiled a list of x's that
equal
x-sin(x)=C
for given values of C, sort of like antiderivatives. I am sure
that there is someway to find a general formula for this theorum.
But perhaps not as some equations can't be solved. But anyways,
the method you gave seems to work well enough for all practical
purposes.
Thanks,
Brad
Brad - I'm fairly sure there is no analytical (closed form)
solution for x - sin x = C. (Unless obviously if C takes a
special value, like pi/2-1 for instance).
The problem is that sin x = [eix - e-ix
]/2i. Now I know that ex - x = C cannot be solved
analytically, so I doubt replacing the ex by sin x
can.
I wouldn't say my method is OK for practical purposes. It is only
really of use when the triangle is very narrow. I can do a
similar one for when the base of the triangle is close to the
diameter of the circle, and I'm sure other methods could be
thought up in special cases.
As for compiling a table - I don't know if it has been done but
it would be very easy to do using an Excel spreadsheet.
Alternatively if you have a calculator to hand you can use
iteration:
1) Choose a value of C, which you want to solve x for.
2) Put the calculator in radians mode.
3) Put in any number between 0 and 1 (say 0.5).
4) Now take the sin of this number.
5) Add C on.
6) Press equals, and go to 4) applying the steps to the new
number.
I'm assuming your calculator is the old fashioned (and I think
better) type in which you press the operator after inputting the
number (rather than the new ones in which you type in the
operation algebraically). If not that makes it more
cumbersome.
I think this is going to always converge. After a lot of trials,
the value of x will be the number in the display BEFORE C is
added on. By the way, anyone know how many solutions to x - sin x
= C there are on the complex plane?
Alternatively if you're into computer programming you could
easily do the whole thing automatically.
Yours,
Michael
I would to suggest iteration (graphic calculators do the
donkey work) as the simplest way of solving the equation x - sin
x = C.
Of course, for given x, x - 1 < = C < = x + 1.
Then suppose C = 4.7
we know already that x is between 3.7 and 5.7. So your iteration
is simplified because you don't have to guess what to make x as
the first guess.
Neil M