I understand that the reciprocal prime number series, that
is:
(1/2) + (1/3) + (1/5) + (1/7) + (1/11) + (1/13) ... (1/p)
diverges as the terms approach to infinity, as calculated by
Euler.
Can anyone help me out as to why this is? I would REALLY
appreciate some help telling why this is a diverging series, as I
am giving a speech on the interesting properties of primes.
THANKS!
Charlie
OK. Let's assume that the series doesn't
diverge to infinity, but is bounded above by L.
To start, we need the result that for |x| < 1:
-ln(1 - x) = x + x2 /2 + x3 /3 + ...
If 0 < x < = 1/2 we know that:
x2 /2 + x3 /3 + ... < (x2 +
x3 + ...)/2 = x2 /2 x[1 + x + x2
+ ...] < = x2 < x
So -ln(1 - x) < 2x for 0 < x < = 1/2.
Substitute in x = 1/2, 1/3, ...:
-ln(1 - 1/2) < 2/2
-ln(1 - 1/3) < 2/3
-ln(1 - 1/5) < 2/5
...
-ln(1 - 1/p) < 2/p
Add all these together:
-ln((1 - 1/2)(1 - 1/3)...(1 - 1/p)) < 2(1/2 + 1/3 + ... + 1/p)
< 2L
Therefore:
(1 - 1/2)(1 - 1/3)...(1 - 1/p) > e-2L
for all p. But e-2L > 0 so assuming your series
converges, we have deduced that:
(1 - 1/2)(1 - 1/3)(1 - 1/5)...(1 - 1/p)
is bounded below by a positive number. Writing K = e2L
we have:
(1 - 1/2)-1 (1 - 1/3)-1 ...(1 -
1/p)-1 < K
for all prime p.
So:
(1 + 1/2 + 1/22 + ...)(1 + 1/3 + 1/32 +
...)...(1 + 1/p + 1/p2 + ...) < K
for all prime p.
Can you see why this can't possibly be true? If you remember
unique prime factorisation you should be able to derive a
contradiction from this, which would then prove that our original
assumption that the series was bounded above is false. As the
series is positive it would then follow that it diverges to
infinity as required. Write back if you have trouble finishing
off the proof.
Sorry, but I'm still a little lost. I understand what you're
saying but I'm unsure as to where you are going with it, and how
you get the last step:
(1 + 1/2 + 1/22 + ...)(1 + 1/3 + 1/32 + ...)...(1 + 1/p +
1/p2 + ...) < K
Thank you very much for your help!
Charlie
The last step comes from 1 + 1/x + 1/x2 +
1/x3 ... = 1/(1-x), i.e. the formula for the sum to
infinity of a geometric progression - are you familiar with this?
Otherwise I'd be happy to explain it.
Regards,
Olof.
Okay, I get the last step, thanks for the explanation. What I
don't understand is how one proves that this resulting product
does not converge. Thanks again for your help everyone!
Charlie
|
Õ p prime | (1-p-1)-1 |
|
Õ p prime | (1+p-1+p-2+¼) |
|
¥ å r=1 | r-1 |
One last question (I promise!!) I am not really familiar with
sigma notation, and don't know exactly what you mean when you say
"expand out the bracket." I know how to prove that the harmonic
series is divergent, so once again all I need is a little
clearing up about the middle step. Thanks again everyone for all
your time!
Charlie
| (1+p1-1+p1-2+¼)(1+p2-1+p2-2+¼)¼ = |
å | p1a1 p2a2¼ |
Thanks again Kerwin, but I don't understand how you can
convert the product into a sigma notation. If you could break the
last step down for me, I would appreciate it greatly. Finally,
when you say "harmonic series" I assume you are referring to the
series:
1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4.... etc
Am I right?
Charlie
|
å | p1-a1 p2-a2¼ |
|
å | p1-a1 p2-a2 |
|
å | p1-a1 p2-a2¼pN-aN |
Kerwin:
You are a GOD! Thank you ever so much!
Charlie