Hi,
How can I find the largest possible perimeter for a rectangle
that can be drawn inside the ellipse
(x/a)2 + (y/b)2 = 1.
It's only a 2 mark question, but I just can't see how to do it at
the moment.
Thanks.
I get 4(a2 +b2 )½ - not sure if that's right. Seems to require quite a bit of thinking compared to ordinary 2 mark questions.
I don't actually understand how you got the 4(a2
+b2 )1/2 .
Could you please explain?
Perhaps this explanation will seem to make more sense. First,
are you ok with what we are trying to maximize is y+x? (Our
answer will be 4 times this though). We can use only positive
values for y since this is what we are finding. We therefore want
to maximize x+b(1-x2 /a2 )1/2 .
We can solve this by differentiating and setting to zero, then
find x, find y, and add them together, then multiply by 4, and
you should be able to come up with the answer.
Hope this helps,
Brad
Though, I should mention, Kerwin's method is perfectly fine and a good deal more elegant than this method.
A more elegant method involves the QM-AM inequality.....
What's that method Kerwin? QM-AM: is that something to do with the arithmetic and q***(something) means?
|
|
What is Cauchy-Schwarz? I've seen it mentioned a couple of
times on here, but never asked about it.
Regards,
Olof
|
This is basically an extension of the
fact that the magnitude of a cosine of a real angle is less than
or equal to 1.
If:
x = (x1 ,x2 )
y = (y1 ,y2 )
Then (x1 y1 + x2 y2
)2 = (x .y )2 = |x
|2 |y |2 cos2 (theta)
< = |x |2 |y |2 =
(x1 2 + x2 2
)(y1 2 + y2 2 )
where theta is the angle between x and y . This
demonstrates the inequality for n = 2 and also makes it clear why
they need to be parallel for equality. You can justify it in a
similar way for N-D though you need to be careful about how you
define angle. Alternatively, you can prove the inequality by
expanding it out and collecting terms and using the fact that
squares are positive.
Here
is a previous thread where C-S was discussed about halfway down
the page.
Kerwin