Finding cube roots by hand
By Jeff on Wednesday, December 15, 1999
- 12:49 am :
I know how to do square roots out by hand. Is there a
formula/method, beside using logarithms, to get cube roots by
hand.
By Amanda Turner (Agt24) on Tuesday,
December 28, 1999 - 10:13 am :
What you would like to do is find a solution to an equation
of the form
where in your case
. There are a number of
ways of doing this which involve finding sucessive approximations to the
solution. I shall outline three different methods.
One of the most straightforward methods is known as the method of bisection:
For this method we need
to be a continuous function. Find two points
such that
and
have opposite signs. This implies that
has (at least) one root in the interval
. Let
. If
has the same sign as
, there is a root in
, otherwise a
root lies in
. We have therefore halved the size of the interval
containing the root, so by repeating the above procedure we can get closer and
closer to the root. If we want to guarantee being within, say
, of
the actual root, (i.e. if the actual root is
, we want our approximation to
lie in the interval
) how many times must we
repeat the procedure?
Another method is to use what is known as a point iteration. Here the idea is
to express
in the form
for some function
. One way of
doing this is letting
although this isn't the only way. Then
pick some starting point
and let
for
,
,
,
the sequence
,
,
, to say
, then
will be a solution of
. The main problem with this method is that
the sequence
,
, not converge (e.g. it may keep getting
bigger and bigger). Draw some graphs showing
and
and try and
work out the behaviour of the sequence
,
, different
shapes of
. Can you find some conditions on
that will guarantee
convergence? Try and find different functions
for
. Which
ones give the fastest convergence? (A good measure of how close you are to the
actual solution is to look at how big
is).
If you know some calculus, a special case of the above is known as the
Newton-Raphson Method. This converges extremely quickly and is probably the
method your calculator uses to work out things like square roots! In this case
we let
. (Then
if and only if
). So we
iterate using
. (In case you don't know any
calculus, for
,
. Try it and compare how
quickly it converges in comparison with the other methods.) How does this
method work? (Hint: look at tangents on the graph of
)
Try and see why all of the above methods work (or don't, in the case of some
functions in the second method). if you don't understand anything I have
written or have any further questions, please ask me.
.