(mb )a =m(mod
n)
By Dan.Weinrauch Dan.Weinrauch (M1118) on
Friday, May 4, 2001 - 09:47 am :
Why it is enough to prove that (mb )a =
m(mod p)
and (mb )a = m(mod q) when n = p x q are
prime rather than (mb )a = m(mod n)?
By Kerwin Hui (Kwkh2) on Friday, May
4, 2001 - 11:28 am :
This is a consequence of Chinese Remainder Theorem.
(One version of) Chinese Remainder Theorem states that, if
and
are
coprime, then the congruence
(mod
),
(mod
)
has a unique solution (mod
).
[Another version is a generalisation to a set of pairwise coprime integers
, the congruence
(mod
),
has a unique solution (mod
,
, ...,
)]
Now, as
and
are distinct prime, they are coprime. Hence, if we let
, then we have the congruence
(mod
),
(mod
)
Now we can immediately spot a value of
that satisfy this condition,
namely
. Hence,
(mod
), as required.
Kerwin
By Susan Langley (Sml30) on Monday, May
7, 2001 - 09:37 am :
If (mb )a =m (mod
p)=m (mod q). So m (mod p) =m (mod q) as p and q prime, highest
common factor =1.
So, say m (mod p)= m (mod q) = r, so m= cp + r=kq + r. Solving
for c and k (to some degree), cp=kq since LCF=1 c must be a
multiple of q and k a multiple of p. So, m= spq +r =sn+r so m
(mod n)=r=(mb )a .
I hope that makes sense!