Transcendental Numbers 2
By Michael Doré on Wednesday, July 04, 2001 - 08:14 pm:
The topic of transcendental numbers has
cropped up quite a lot recently. See for example here
.
During the next day or so, I'm going to state three results
which are useful for showing various numbers are transcendental, and will
prove the first two theorems, since the proofs are quite interesting, and not
impossible to understand. In particular the second theorem will prove that
and
are transcendental (and hence irrational), which is a frequently
occuring theme. I'd be grateful for any feedback if there are any unclear
points, or for any other reason.
Firstly, the definition.
A number
(real or complex) is algebraic if and only if there exists a
polynomial
with integer coefficients such that
. A number which
is not algebraic is said to be transcendental. If
is algebraic then the
minimal polynomial of
is the polynomial
with minimal degree such that
.
Here are the three theorems.
- Liouville's Theorem
If
is algebraic then there exists
such that for all integer
and natural
we have:
where
is the degree of
. (That is, the degree of the minimal polynomial
such that
.)
Equivalently, if the quantity
can be made arbitrarily small
then
is transcendental.
This theorem effectively shows if a number is very "close" to being rational
(by which I mean it has very good rational approxiations) then it is
transcendental.
For example, using this theorem, it is a straightforward exercise to show that
the series:
is transcendental. The reason is because the terms of the series are decreasing
in absolute value so rapidly that the series has excellent rational
approximations hence Liouville's theorem shows it's transcendental.
In fact this number was the first number ever to be proved to be transcendental.
I'm not sure, but I think that before they'd proved it was transcendental,
most people believed all numbers were algebraic. Later Cantor stepped on the
scene and showed that älmost all" numbers are transcendental.
- Lindemann's theorem
This one shows that if
, ...,
are distinct algebraic numbers
and
, ...,
are non-zero and algebraic then
is non-zero.
Three useful facts that follow immediately from this theorem are:
-
,
are transcendental.
-
,
,
,
are transcendental if
is
algebraic and not 0.
-
,
,
,
are
transcendental if
is algebraic and irrational.
- Gelfond-Schneider
If
,
are algebraic with
not equal to 0,1 and
not rational then
is transcendental.
I will not be proving this one as the proof is incredibly complicated,
intricate and uses complex analysis. To give some idea, the proof was first
obtained in the 1930s. It was one of the 20 problems Hilbert proposed in 1900.
It follows pretty quickly from this theorem that:
-
is transcendental (this has been asked at least 3 times
before!)
-
is transcendental (to prove this, use the fact that
).
It is not however known whether
is transcendental or not (or even
whether it's irrational). Nor is it known whether
or indeed any
individual linear combination of
and
is transcendental.