4x + 4y + 4z a perfect square


By Archishman Ghosh on Thursday, November 29, 2001 - 06:55 pm:

Hello,please tell me how to proceed on this,
Find all natural numbers x,y,z such that
4x + 4y + 4z is a perfect square.
Archishman.


By Kerwin Hui on Thursday, November 29, 2001 - 08:07 pm:
Different books have different definitions of natural numbers - some include 0, others don't. Let say we take the definition with 0. The first thing to do is to note that if x, y, z are all > 0, we can divide by 4 and still get a square. Notice that at most one of x, y, z can be zero. So we only need to solve the following:

(x) Find natural x, y ³ 1 with 4x+4y+1 is a perfect square.

Can you see how to answer (x)?

Kerwin


By Archishman Ghosh on Friday, November 30, 2001 - 10:18 am:

Hi Kerwin,
The defn. of natural numbers as I have always known(in all text books that i have,read)is that it includes all +ve integers greater than 0.
Again,if we divide by 4 throughout,how can we get a square?
Thanks for your time.
Archishman.


By Arun Iyer on Friday, November 30, 2001 - 07:23 pm:

well,
the equation (x) above can be written as .....

(2x )2 + 22y + 1

if i write 2y=x+1 then the equation turns out as...
(2x )2 + 2x2x x1 + 1
i.e(2x +1)2 ...a perfect square.....

therefore,for all x,y such that 2y=x+1 we see that the number is a perfect square...

am i right Kerwin??
love arun


By Kerwin Hui on Saturday, December 01, 2001 - 02:00 am:

That's right, but since we have to find all solutions to the original problem, we must find all solutions (and prove it).

Kerwin


By Archishman Ghosh on Saturday, December 01, 2001 - 05:54 pm:

Hi Kerwin,
Please do the problem with the definition that natural numbers the numbers 1,2,3,...,n,...
Next,could you explain what you meant by
"if x,y,z are all> 0 then we can divide by 4 and still get a square."
Thanks,
Archie.


By Kerwin Hui on Monday, December 03, 2001 - 10:06 pm:

If x,y,z are all > 0, we can conclude that 4x +4y +4z is even and is a square, so we can divide by 4 and still get a square.

The bit about whether to include zero or not is not that important. Since we showed if and only if (x,y,z) is a solution, then (x+1,y+1,z+1) is a solution, you just have to be careful when giving your final answer.

BTW, we still have not proved those are the only solution....

Hope this clear up

Kerwin


By Arun Iyer on Tuesday, December 04, 2001 - 06:40 pm:

well,
i would it a bit a clearer....for you archishman..

let 4x +4y +4z be a square....
let us take 4 common here....then....we get...
4x[4x-1 +4y-1 +4z-1 ]

now 4 is a square..therefore...[4x-1 +4y-1 +4z-1 ] must be a square if [4x +4y +4z ] is to be a square....

like this we can continuously divide by 4 and still get many square....this is what is Kerwin is saying..(am i right Kerwin??)

hope that's clear
love arun


By Michael Doré on Monday, December 10, 2001 - 09:43 am:

Yes, that's right. Also, your solution set is essentially complete. The complete set of non-negative integers (x,y,z) for which x ³ y ³ z and 4x+4y+4z is a square are parametrised by (2a+b+1,a+b+1,b) where a, b are non-negative integers. (So if you want a solution in naturals, you just need to take b positive.)

As above, we can set z=0, WLOG. It is easy to check x, y are positive, and it then suffices to prove that 2y=x+1. Now since 4x+4y+1 is a square which is larger than (2x)2 we can write:

4x+4y+1=(2x+a)2

for some positive integer a.

Expanding and dividing through by 2x+1 we obtain

22y-x-1 = a + (a2 - 1)2-x-1.

The right hand side is at least 1. It follows that the left hand side is an integer.

Therefore (a2 - 1)2-x-1 is integral. Note that a-1 and a+1 can't both be multiples of 4, so either 2x|a-1 or 2x|a+1.

Therefore unless a = 1, we must have a ³ 2x-1 in which case we find:

22x+1 ³ 4x + 4y = (2x + a)2 - 1 ³ (2x+1-1)2 - 1 = 2×22x+1 - 2x+2

This gives 2x+2 ³ 22x+1, 1 ³ x so x = y = 1, therefore 4 + 4 + 1 = (2 + a)2 which still gives a = 1.

So all solutions must have a = 1, so 22y-x-1 = 1, and 2y = x+1 so we're done.

I think Kerwin has a proof by writing the number in base 4; that may be a bit more intuitive.