Sum of Square Roots
By Graeme Mcrae on Thursday, January 03,
2002 - 12:02 am:
This question was given to me, which I thought would be fun
for people to think about.
For non-negative numbers
,
,
and
,
Prove:
Please don't answer this if you've seen it (or one like it)
before. I would like to leave the question on the board for a day
or two so that people who haven't seen it before can try to work
on it. Thanks!
By Michael Doré on Thursday, January 03, 2002 - 03:58 pm:
I think we can prove the more general result:
If
, ...,
,
, ...,
are non-negative and:
...
then
Then the result follows by setting
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
By
Graeme Mcrae on Tuesday, January 08, 2002 - 04:56
am:
A good way to solve this puzzle is to make a substitution. If we define new
variables represented by capital
,
,
, and
as follows, then the
solution is easier:
Let
Let
Let
Let
Now, solving for
,
,
, and
, we get the following equations.
Since
, and
, etc., we get the following four inequalities:
Notice that in each inequality the same constant appears on both sides, so
they cancel:
A square is always non-negative, so it can be subtracted from the "less than"
side of an equality:
Now multiply the first inequality by 6, the second by 2, the third by 1, and
the fourth by 3:
Now add up the four equations, then divide by 24:
Now substitute the lower-case expressions in place of
,
,
, and
,
and then add 10 to both sides:
That's it! Pretty easy, don't you think?
By Kerwin Hui on Tuesday, January 08,
2002 - 06:07 pm:
Michael's conjecture should also have the condition
increasing. It is very easy to find a counterexample otherwise (e.g.
,
, with
,
, gives
).
The proof is very similar to the solution of the problem.
Kerwin