Prove a x b=(a,b) x [a,b] (HCF x LCM)


By Anonymous on Saturday, September 23, 2000 - 08:31 am :

Hi,

I came by the following question:

Prove ab = (a,b)[a,b]

I thought of letting d = ab/(a,b)

And showing that this is a multiple of [a,b] or something

I'm not sure!

Hope you can help!


By Anonymous on Sunday, September 24, 2000 - 04:30 pm :

Funnily enough, I have also come across the above question!

However, here's another more interesting one:

If (a,b) =1, then prove that (a-b, a+b) =1 or 2

Good luck


By David Loeffler (P865) on Sunday, September 24, 2000 - 05:46 pm :

The second is quite a fun one. Here is a fairly nice proof I once came across.

Clearly if X divides two numbers M and N, it must divide M-N and M+N. So if d divides a+b and a-b, d must divide (a-b)+(a+b) = 2a, and it must also divide (a+b)-(a-b) = 2b. Thus any common divisor of a-b and a+b must be a common divisor of 2a and 2b; so it can be at most (2a, 2b) = 2. Therefore, in general, we have (a+b, a-b) = 1 or 2. QED.

(It will be one if a and b differ in parity, i.e. one is even and one is odd. If both are odd a-b and a+b are both even, so (a-b,a+b)=2.)

I can't think of a nice explanation of the first one offhand - that will take a better mathematician than I, I think.


By Kerwin Hui (P1312) on Sunday, September 24, 2000 - 08:47 pm :

Well, since there is unique factorisation, consider the maximum power a to which a prime p can be raised such that

pa | a

and similarly for b. Asssume, WLOG, that


ab then a is the maximum power to which p can be raised such that pa divides {a,b}, and b is the corresponding case for (a,b). so the power of p in ab=a +b =power of p in (a,b){a,b} QED

Kerwin
By Barkley Bellinger (Bb246) on Thursday, October 19, 2000 - 09:30 pm :
Here is another proof of ab=(a,b)[a,b] which follows the line of thought suggested by the original questioner.

It relies on a result known as Bezout's Theorem.

This states that there exists integers p, q such that pa+qb=c if and only if (a,b) divides c.

I shall assume this and use it where necessary.

In the questioner's notation, let d=ab/(a,b)=Ab=aB, where a=A(a,b) b=B(a,b)

We see that d is a multiple of both a and b, so all we need to do is whos that there is none smaller.

Let m be any common multiple of a and b.

Now, (A,B)=1, if you think about it.

So, by Bezout's Theorem, there exists integers p, q such that pA+qB=1

mpA+mqB=m

But d=Ab divides mpA (since b divides m)

and d=aB divides mqB (since a divides m)

Therefore d divides m. But m was any common multiple of a and b, so d must be the least common multiple.