Congratulations on your solutions to David from Sevenoaks School and
Andrei from Tudor Vianu National College, Bucharest, Romania. The
following solution takes parts of David's and parts of Andrei's
solution.
We are given the formula for the nth Fibonacci number, namely
Fn=
1Ö5
(an-bn)
where a and b
are solutions of the quadratic equation x2-x-1=0 and a > b.
Firstly, we can work out a and b, the two solutions of,
x2-x-1=0 using the quadratic equation formula. As a > b we have
a =
1+Ö52
and
b =
1-Ö52
.
An interesting thing to point out here is that, using the formula
for the sum and product of the roots of the quadratic equation,
a+ b = 1 and ab = -1.
[ Editor's note: All the results can be proved by number
crunching using the values of a and b and simplifying the
expressions involving Ö5 but they can be proved more simply
using the expression x2-x-1=0.]
(1) Dividing a2 - a- 1=0 by a gives
a-1-
1a
= 0
and it follows that
a+
1a
= 2a-1 = Ö5
. Similarly
b+
1b
= 2b- 1 = -Ö5
. (2) From Part (1) we have
a2 -aÖ5 +1
= 0
b2 + bÖ5 + 1
= 0.
Substituting the definition of the n-th Fibonacci number and using
these results from Part (1) and the identity ab = -1 we
get:
Hence Fn2 + Fn+12 = F2n+1.
(3)To show that for any four consecutive Fibonacci numbers
Fn,¼,Fn+3 the formula
(FnFn+3)2+(2Fn+1Fn+2)2
is the square of another
Fibonacci number it is much easier to consider the numbers with
regard to the nature of the Fibonacci series that most people know
and love, i.e. using the recursive formula for the series: Fn = Fn-1 + Fn-2 . Any four consecutive Fibonacci numbers can
hence be expressed as x-y, y, x, x+y. (Check this for
yourself!)
If we therefore substitute Fn = x-y, Fn+1=y, Fn+2 = x
and Fn+3 = x + y , the formula
However, we have already shown that for any two consecutive
Fibonacci numbers, Fn2 + Fn+12 = F2n+1 . We defined y
and x earlier to be two consecutive Fibonacci numbers, so y2 + x2 must be the Fibonacci number F2n+3. Hence (y2 + x2)2
, which we have already shown to be the sum of the squares of two
different Fibonacci numbers, is the square of another Fibonacci
number F2n+3, and we have therefore made a Pythagorean triple.
Therefore the proposition made in Part (3) of the question is true,
QED!