This solution was submitted by Curt
from Reigate College. Well done Curt.
(1) Explain the features of the graph of the relation
If the above equation is true then neither
nor
can be
greater than 1. If say
, we have:
and so
, a contradiction, as
for any
. Therefore, this function is not defined for values of
and
greater than 1.
I now quote without proof the fact that if
then
or
. This is useful when applied in this problem.
If
then
or
. If
then
or
. Similarly, if
, then
or
.
The graph is the line segments (where
and
) given
by:
in the first quadrant;
in the second quadrant;
in the third quadrant and
in the fourth quadrant.
Editor's note: By symmetry if
satisfies this relation
then so does
so the graph is the square consisting of the four line
segments described.
The line segments are perpendicular and intersect at (0,1), (-1,0)
(0,-1) and (1,0). The square shape with vertices at the above
co-ordinates, has symmetry in
,
,
and
. I
refer to this as a graph, not a function, due to one-to-many
relation.
2) As
can be written as
, by dividing both
numerator and denominator by
we consider:
Taking the nth root
Hence
(3) Taking the simple case
(the circle), and
considering the first quadrant, it will be shown that
decreases
as
increases. As this is in the first quadrant, the positive
root alone is considered:
As
increases to
a maximum value of 1 on the interval
so
increases monotonically and
decreases monotonically (to
confirm, check f'(x)=-2x).
If we have
(with
), then taking the
positive square root of both sides, we have
. So as
increases,
decreases.
This same method could be extended to all values of
. For
then
for
because
increases
monotonically on the interval
. Clearly, if
then
so
and hence
.
Taking the positive nth root of both sides, we get:
. So
for
; hence as
increases in the first quadrant,
decreases.
Editor's note: Alternatively we can use calculus to prove this.
Fixing one value of
in
:
As
and
are positive in the
first quadrant we see that the derivative is negative which shows
that
decreases as
increases.
When
, on the general graph
we get
so
. From earlier in this question, we have for
,
so
.
Therefore, as there is
only one solution to
in the first quadrant, the graph
should lie outside the square with coordinates:
In the first quadrant, as
, and on
,
neither
nor
may be greater than 1, there are no co-ordinates
on the curve for which
. If
then
, for
so
, which is not allowed in the first quadrant. The curve
must lie inside (or on at the co-ordinate axes) the square with
coordinates (1,0), (0,1), (1,1), (0,0) NB, the curve will touch the
square only at vertices (1,0) and (0,1).
(4) As
,
.
The square which the curve must lie within is fixed (as above).
However, as
increases, the square which the curve must lie
outside of gets increasingly large. As the curve is squeezed
between two squares, its shape becomes increasingly more squared.
For curves where
is even, the curve becomes squeezed in all four
quadrants because, by symmetry (exactly as in part (1) of this
question) the graph is symmetric about
,
,
and
about
.
(5) In the first quadrant the graph of the relation
behaves similarly to other graphs where
is even. However, the
graph cannot be defined in the third quadrant for
and
,
for that would lead to the sum of two negative numbers being 1,
which is not possible. The function is also defined for
, for
negative numbers do have real cube roots. If
then
and so
and
. For large
(large
) this shows that
, therefore the graph reaches an
asymptote with
. The same thing happens as
in
the second quadrant.
The same features occur for the whole family of graphs of
for odd
.
The graphs of
for odd
would have the
symmetrical squarish shape, reflecting the family of graphs in the
first quadrant into the remaining quadrants (see part 1).