Copyright © University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.
'Bicentric Quadrilaterals' printed from https://nrich.maths.org/
We
received a great solution from Zhi of St. Marylebone CE School. She
begins with a diagram:
In the diagram presented, the vertices of the quadrilateral are
labeled
A, B, C and
D, and tangent points
M,
N, P and
Q respectively. The sides are
labelled
a, b, c and
d.
From the properties of the circles we know that the tangents
AM and
AQ, BM and
BN, CN and
CP, DP and
DQ are equal respectively.
Therefore, if the quadrilateral is to be tangential,
AQ+DQ+BN+CN would have to be
equal to
AM+DP+BM+CP, which then
becomes:
$$AD+BC=AB+CD$$ Therefore, we know that a tangential quadrilateral
has to satisfy
AD+BC=AB+CD.
Using the properties of isosceles triangles and angle bisectors, we
can deduce that the reverse is also true, meaning that all
quadrilaterals satisfying $AD+BC=AB+CD$ are tangential.
Is the
reverse obvious? The question only asks for a necessary condition
so in fact we do no need to show the reverse but this could be a
nice extension.
The properties of cyclic quadrilaterals imply that for any cyclic
quadrilateral
ABCD, $\angle A+\angle C =
\angle B +\angle D = 180^{\circ}$.The reverse is also true.
Can you show
this condition is necessary? See the problem Circles in
Quadrilaterals.
Therefore, a bicentric
quadrilateral ABCD has to meet two conditions
- $AD+BD=AB+CD$ and
- $\angle A + \angle C = \angle B +\angle D = 180 ^{\circ}$
With that , we can now
deduce:
- Squares are always bicentric
- Rectangles and rhombi, provided that they aren't squares,
cannot be bicentric as rectangles do not satisfy condition 1, and
rhombi do not satisfy condtion 2.
- Irregular parallelograms do not meet either condition and
cannot be bicentric
- Trapezia might or might not be bicentric, depending on their
side lengths and angles.
Zhi then went on to prove the formula for the
area of a bicentric quadrilateral. We shall omit the proof here
since the question only asks you to verify that the formula works
on the examples you found. If you are interested see the proof of
brahmagupta's formula and try to adapt it to this
problem.