Copyright © University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.
This activity provides a context for practising dividing a three-digit number by a single-digit number. It encourages children to notice patterns and conjecture, and test rules. This may lead to establishing ways of recognising which multiplication tables three-digit numbers appear in.
The lesson may begin by recapping any patterns that children have recognised in the multiplication tables up to x10 or x12. They may know about numbers in the table of 5 always ending in a 5 or a 0 for example. This activity is about extending these rules to thinking about three-digit numbers.
Before the starting the task, it may be worth reminding children of the methods they could use for division.
As a class you could explore a divisor of 2 and record results as below:
Calculation | Whole number answer | Remainder of 1 |
269 ÷ 2 = 134 r1 | 269 | |
547 ÷ 2 = 273 r1 | 547 | |
466 ÷ 2 = 233 | 466 | |
728 ÷ 2 = 364 | 728 | |
Encourage the class to look closely at the numbers resulting in different types of answer, to look for similarities and use this information to generate a rule for the types of numbers that appear in each column. Make a conjecture and then test it!
Remember that whole number answers mean that the dividend is a multiple of the divisor.
The class could then all explore the same divisor or different groups could look at different divisors (an opportunity to differentiate the activity).
Some children may move onto the extension task (below).
What is the same about the numbers with a whole number answer?
Can you come up with a rule?
Do you think you could spot multiples of ... without needing to complete the division calculation?
Another way of approaching the problem is to keep the dividend constant and vary the divisors. So you could explore what happens when you divide 123 (for example) by 2, then by 3, then by 4 and so on. Can you find any three-digit prime numbers? Is there a way of spotting these numbers quickly?
A multiplication grid and a calculator would be useful (the latter only if the emphasis is not on practising a written method).