How is the continued fraction for ex

proven?
Thanks,
Brad
Brad, have a look here
first. When you are comfortable with it, I'll show you how to
expand it for ez
Andre
Sorry to take so long to get back; I'm comfortable with the
article.
Brad
Firstly, we define
F(a,b,x) = 1 + (a)/(b).x/1! + (a(a+1))/(b(b+1)).x2/2! +
(a(a+1)(a+2))/(b(b+1)(b+2)).x3/3! + …
This is analogous to (a generalisation of) (8) of the
article.
Next we need two recurrence relationships. I claim that
F(a,b,x) = F(a+1,b+1,x) + q(a,b).x.F(a+1,b+2,x)
Also that
F(a,b,x) = F(a,b+1,x) + r(a,b).x.F(a+1,b+2,x)
By matching up the powers of x, in the power series, can you find
q(a,b) & r(a,b)?
Andre
I get
q(a,b) = (a-b)/[b(b+1)]
r(a,b) = a/[b(b+1)].
I'm still unsure what to do next. We're naturally looking for a
relationship to the effect of either
1/rn = 2n -1 - x/(2 + rn+1)
or
1/rn = 2 + x/(2n - 1 - rn+1),
where rn is a combination of F's, but I've yet to find
one...
Brad
Brad, using your q(a,b) we have
F(a,b,x) = F(a+1,b+1,x) – (b-a)/[b(b+1)].x.F(a+1,b+2,x)
Rearranging:
F(a+1,b+1,x) / F(a,b,x) = 1 /
1 – (b-a)/[b(b+1)].x.F(a+1,b+2,x) / F(a+1,b+1,x)
(1)
However, using your r(a,b) we also have:
F(a,b,x) = F(a,b+1,x) + a/[b(b+1)].x.F(a+1,b+2,x)
Rearranging:
F(a,b+1,x) / F(a,b,x) = 1 / 1
+ a/[b(b+1)].x.F(a+1,b+2,x) / F(a,b+1,x) (2)
If you look at the rightermost part of (1), i.e. F(a+1,b+2,x) /
F(a+1,b+1,x), this is just the LHS of (2), with a replaced by a+1,
b replaced by b+1. So we substitute (2) into (1). Of the resulting
equation, we can then substitute (1) into it and so on, until we
get:
F(a+1,b+1,x) / F(a,b,x) = 1 /
1 – x(b-a)/b(b+1) / 1 +
x(a+1)/(b+1)(b+2) / 1 - …
Now set a=0:
F(1,b+1,x) = 1 / 1 – x /
(b+1) / 1 + x/(b+1)(b+2) / 1
- x (b+1)/[(b+2)(b+3)] / 1 +
…
F(1,b+1,x) = 1 / 1 – x /
(b+1) + x / (b+2) -
x(b+1) / (b+3) + …
Now let b ® 0 [why can’t we
just set it to zero?]
F(1, 1,x) = 1 / 1 – x /
1 + x / 2 - x / 3
+ …
Now the LHS is just ex. To get it in the form you
originally wrote, replace x by –x and take the reciprocal of
both sides.
Andre
One last point, Brad. If you set z=1 in
your continued fraction you get:
e = 1 + 1 / 1- 1 / 2+
1 / 3-
However you will also find that
e = 2 + 1 / 1+ 1 / 2+
1 / 1+
where the denominators follow the pattern
[1,2,1,1,4,1,1,6,1,1,8,..]
You may wish to try to derive the second formula from the
first.
Andre
Andre - the result you give is interesting; I've seen it before,
but assumed that it's proven in an entirely different manner. The
proof of it still puzzles me, though. I tried using recursive
formulae, but I didn't get too far with that.
Could you give me a hint?
Thanks,
Brad
Brad, one thing you might look at is successive approximants to the
continued fractions. Thus look at:
1, 1+1/(1-1), 1+1/(1-1/(2+1)), 1+1/(1-1/(2+1/(3-1))), etc
and
2+1, 2+1/(1+1), 2+1/(1+1/(2+1)) etc.
I’d do it on a spreadsheet. Notice any commonality? Now try
replacing the last ‘1’ in each sequence by another
number. What happens to the commonality?
Andre
Brad,
You may not be looking at this thread any more but if you are, you
may be interested in the generalisation of the second continued
fraction above for e. The question that has been bothering me for a
while is how it generalises to ex. I’ve finally
come up with an answer:
ex = (1+x) + x^2/(2-x)+
x/(3-x)+ x/1+
1/1+ x/(5-x)+
x/1+ 1/1+
x/(7-x)+
Putting x=1 gives the series we had above.
This is effectively a ‘rearrangement’ of the one that
you originally posted.
Andre