Please could somebody tell me if the following workings are
correct, or if I am using properties that don't hold for complex
numbers.
eix = cosx + isinx
If x=p/2:
eip/2 = i
Raising both sides to power i:
(eip/2)i =
ii
By law of indices:
e-p/2 = ii
This is a bit strange since the LHS represents a real number.
Is this right or have I gone completely wrong?!
This is right, there's only one other
thing to say, and that is that this is not the only value for
ii. eip/2+2npi=i for all integers n. Therefore
ii=e-p/2-2np for all integers n. In general, when you do
things like raising complex numbers to the power of other complex
numbers, you get an infinite number of values. You might like to
try to think about how you work out (a+ib)c+id and why
this leads to an infinite number of values. (Hint: take logs). If
you can't do this, post again and I'll f
ill in the details.
I've tried to work out (a+ib)(c+id), but cannot get a completely real solution - I can only get parts of it to be real. Please help me!
Oops, I think I may have misled you, you don't always get a real solution, ii is special in that respect. In fact, if you have the form for (a+ib)c+id you could probably find the condition for it to be real reasonably easily. Here's another hint, let z=a+ib and w=c+id, then we want to work out zw, we know that zw=ewlog(z) for real w,z and this is also true for complex w,z. Now we need to work out what log(z) is, well, if you write z as reiq then clearly log(z)=log(r)+iq. In other words, log(z)=log(abs(z))+iArg(z) where Arg(z) is the angle of z. Do you want to try to finish this off or shall I finish it up?
I hope this is what you were thinking of.
wlog(z)=(c+id)log(z)
=(c+id)(log(abs(z))+iArg(z))
=(c+id)(log(a2+b2)1/2+iTan-1(b/a))
So therefore (a+ib)c+id=
e(c+id)(log(a2+b2)1/2+iArctan(b/a))
Aaaagh!
This gives the special case when a=c=0 and b=d=1 of
e-p/2
That's right, but you didn't put in the
bit about multiple values of log(z). When you find the angle
Arctan(b/a) there are two problems. First of all, this only gives
the correct angle in two quadrants as (-b)/(-a)=b/a, which is why
we define the function Arg(z) to be the correct angle in all 4
quadrants. Secondly, there are an infinite number of possible
values for the angle, Arg(z)+2np for any
n. If you now put this into the equation you will find more special
cases where it is real. Another slight simplification is
log(sqrt(a2+b2))=(1/2)log(a2+b
2). So, expanding out we get:
(a+ib)c+id=exp((c+id)((1/2)log(a2+b2)+i(Arg(a+ib)+2n
p)). If we put the imaginary part of this expression equal
to 0, we get
0=exp(i((d/2)log(a2+b2)+c(Arg(a+ib)+2n
p)))
0=sin((d/2)log(a2+b2)+c(Arg(a+ib)+2n
p))
So, when this holds, it will be real. So one condition we could
write for the thing to be real is. There are two integers, n and m
such that:
(d/2)log(a2+b2)+c(Arg(a+ib)+2np)=mp
If you're still interested, see if you can simplify this condition
into something nicer. By the way, another good special case when it
is real is when b=d=0, a>=0.
It may seem strange that there isn't a unique value of
(a+ib)c+id, and it is. A function like log(z) which has
this property can be split into what are called branches, each
different value of n is a different branch. What you can do is take
what is called the "principal branch", this is denoted Log(z) and
is the one where the angle is in the interval [-p,p). This specifies a
unique value of (a+ib)c+id.