What shape would a string of length l, that is lighter than air,
form, if its ends were tied down and separated by a distance of s.
I'm sure it's a parabola, and by the looks of what I'm envisioning
it to be, it would be something along the lines of
y=(s-l)x2+ a variable dependent upon s.
I can't seem to be able to find out why though.
What is the equation, and why?
Thanks,
Brad
Catenary.
Like the shape a loose chain takes.
Similar to a cosh function
A hanging chain forms a catenary. I'm not sure exactly what shape something that is lighter than air would take up, you'd have to set up a physical model, however if it turns out that it is just like gravity acting in a different direction then it would be an upside down catenary.
Thanks. I was able to find a derivation for a hanging chain. It
comes up with the general result of
y=a cosh(x/a)
where a is a constant. I think we might be able to apply this to
the above example (assuming that the two ends were at equal
altitudes, y=0)
Then,
0=a cosh(s/2a)
And
dl/dx=(1+a sinh(x/a))
This should end up solving for an equation to match the string,
although you'll have to change a to -a in the final equation.
I do have a few questions regarding the text I read, where does the
idea that the horizontal force is
Tcos(o)
where T is the tension at a point, and o
is the angle that the string's tangent would meet with the x axis
at the same point come from?
Thanks,
Brad
Right, the tension bit is basically
mechanics stuff which I don't understand particularly well.
However, I'll do my best; in a string, the tension (which is
constant along the string =T) acts in the direction of the tangent
of the string (I think). So the horizontal force acting on the
string can be found by simply resolving the forces in the x and y
direction.
You're right, the catenary proof isn't in the notes, but you can
set up a calculus of variations problem to do it, you want to
minimise potential energy
(ò0 a-mgy dx, where m is the
density of the string)
subject to the constraint that y(0)=y(a)=0 and ò0
asqrt(1+(dy/dx)2)dx=L
the length of the string. If you can't do this (and it is hard)
post again and I'll see if I can help.
The catenary proof is pretty easy to prove
using instrinsic co-ordinates, and by resolving forces. It's a bit
late so I'll just sketch the proof:
With intrinsic co-ordinates, instead of representing a curve as y =
f(x) in Cartesian co-ordinates, we specify the curve by s = g(t),
so that an arbitrary point on the curve with intrinsic
co-ordinates (s,t) satisfies the following:
1) At this point the curve's tangent makes an angle t with the
x-axis.
2) The length of the curve from its lowest point to this point is
s.
Now it is clear in this case with a hanging chain that no two
points on the curve will have equal gradient (in sign and
magnitude). So we can uniquely specify our curve by the formula s =
g(t).
Let the tension in the chain at the point (s,t) be T(t).
Now consider the piece of curve from the lowest point of the chain
to point with intrinsic co-ordinates (s,t). The mass of this piece
is ps (where p = length density of chain). The weight of this
section is therefore psg and must be balanced by the vertical
component of the tension at the point (s,t) (note there is no
vertical tension provided at the lowest point on the curve, as its
gradient is zero):
T(t) sin t = psg
We can also resolve horizontally on this piece of curve:
T(0) cos 0 = T(t) cos t
(i.e. the two horizontal tensions must cancel for
equilibrium)
So T(t) = T(0)/cos t
So our equation is:
psg = sin t T(0)/cos t
Which is of the form:
s = A tan t
where A is a constant.
This is (I hope) the equation for a catenary in intrinsic
co-ordinates.
To get this back into Cartesian co-ordinates you can use the
relation:
s = ò[sqrt(1 +
(dy/dx)2)dx] = A tan t = A dy/dx
So differentiating and squaring:
1 + (dy/dx)2 = A2
(d2y/dx2)2
which by way of z = dy/dx becomes:
1 + z2 = A2(dz/dx)2
which can be solve by taking the square root of each side. The
final answer is z = k sinh x so y = k cosh x for some constant k
(we needn't bother with integration constants), which is the
catenary.
Sorry if that was poorly explained,
Michael