Possible approach

You could start by demonstrating making the lidless boxes from a $10 \times10$ square. First cut one square from each corner and fold up the edges.

Ask learners what the area of the base is and how many cubes it would hold. How do they know? Explain that you are going to cut a $2 \times2$ square from each corner next, but before doing so, ask the group to visualise the resulting box. What would the area of the base be this time and how many cubes would it hold? Either make the box for the children to see, or invite them to check their
visualisations in pairs. Continue with a $3 \times3$ square cut from each corner but this time do not ask about the size, simply ask them to picture the box in their heads. (A $10 \times10$ square, which can be enlarged for a bigger group, can be downloadedÂ here.)

Pose the problem itself and give learners squared paper (centimetre squares are ideal) to work on a solution in pairs so that they are able to talk through their ideas with a partner. You may like to encourage learners to predict which box will have the largest volume and to give a reason for their prediction. You will need to supply scissors and possibly sticky tape. Some might make a table
of their results, or you could collate the class results on the board for everyone to see. Continuing with differently-sized squares, both smaller and larger than $15$, will produce some interesting number patterns.

In the plenary, invite learners to show their work and discuss the results. Were their predictions correct? What do they notice about the volume as the cut-out squares get bigger? Can they get a feel for why this is? A display of a series of boxes can be made with the different volumes written in the base.

How big is the base/bottom of this box? How high are the sides? So how much does it hold?

Are you sure that this is a square? Why not count it and see?

What is happening to the volume as we cut bigger squares out of the paper?

Learners could make a graph of their results as well as trying differently-sized starting squares. Those who really do not need to make many boxes to make the calculations could try intermediate corner numbers such as $2.5 \times 2.5$ cut from the original square. Alternatively, they could try this more
advanced version of the problem.

Some learners might find it easier to start with a $12 \times 12$ square. This means that the base of the first box is $10 \times10$, which gives a familiar starting number. You may also find centimetre cubes useful.