Published January 2011,February 2011.

As a farewell gift, on my retirement from the directorship of NRICH, members of the team organised a day in Cambridge when colleagues and friends I have worked with over the years came together. Many of those who attended, as well as some who could not make it, sent 'retirement presents' in the form of problems to solve. The morning was devoted to working on some of those problems. We sat in groups and, as each problem was presented, enjoyed the challenge of doing mathematics together. All the problems were engaging, though there were many more than we had time for on the day.

In January 2011 the NRICH team has decided to write problems for the site based on some of those they received as 'presents'. I would like to thank everyone who contributed or turned up on the day. Not all of the problems are represented in the January edition of the site but I am sure many of the others will pop up over the coming months and years.

As I wrote the title to this article I intended it to reflect my time at NRICH, my short spell of what you might nominally recall 'retirement' since, and my continuing mathematical journey. It occurred to me however that another interpretation might be the process of problem solving itself. After all, every problem is a challenge to which we apply past knowledge and experiences, and a trick or two that we think might be useful on the way (see Trick or Treat?). As we proceed, we look forward towards our potential solution to see if we are heading in the right direction. When we problem solve we 'look backward' at past experiences that might be useful and 'forward' to the way ahead. Having written much about problem solving over the years, my aim in this short article is to offer a glimpse of me as a problem solver.

The morning session was a special one. Everyone who was there
had come to do mathematics together by way of celebration. There
was a great atmosphere, lots of chatter, sharing and reflection on
the mathematics. The problems challenged us, engaged us, required
us to apply knowledge and think, at least a little, outside the
box. It was just what I would love every mathematics classroom to
feel like: a group of people doing, and enjoying doing, mathematics
together.

Occasions like this are rare for many of us, in fact none of
us might have been in this situation since we were at school, and
some of us may never have been that lucky. Reflecting on my
time as a head of mathematics, when, as a department, we worked on
and talked about mathematics together, it occurs to me now what a
major factor this 'communal activity' was to our success. One
of the important things about NRICH professional
development is that it almost always involves teachers doing
mathematics together. It is by experiencing the tension and 'thrill
of the chase' that the team hopes teachers will begin to get a real
sense of what problem solving in the classroom can be like (as well
as offering time to become very familiar with a task so that you
can take it back into the classroom with some sense of what might
happen).

One member of the NRICH team often says that it is a shame
that many mathematics teachers do not consider mathematics to be at
least one of their hobbies. The only time they indulge is in the
classroom, and this rarely involves doing any new mathematics.
English teachers read, art teachers often indulge in art as a
passion beyond the classroom, PE teachers have sport as a hobby,
music teachers ...

Well there is of course my addiction to various forms of
Sudoku and similar puzzles which, despite my best efforts, I find
difficult to resist.

Then there is my new-found interest in quilting. I am not sure
I want to confess to recently miscalculating the lengths of sides
of some triangular pieces of material I needed to put together to
match a 3x3 square ... All rather embarrassing - I forgot to
add in one of the seams! My error became evident when the two
squares did not match - but I cut some new pieces and, looking
forward, I am fairly confident that I will not make the same
mistake again!

I suppose 'quilting maths' is little different from the
everyday maths of living that I do without thinking; accounts,
estimating time, cooking, tiling (I still have to finish grouting
the shower room even though I have been retired five months),
travel ... In general though, these applications of
mathematics do not stretch my thinking and challenge me in the same
way.

I still enjoy doing NRICH problems - even though I am
retired. I like the structure, and sometimes lack of
structure, of the problems. I like the challenge and the frequently
unexpected that pops up on the way or towards the end of my
journey. I call these my 'Ah' moments. They are much better
than Sudoku but do require my effort and focus! Recently I was
attracted by the problem Three Dice. My
interest was sparked by the relationship between opposite sides of
dice and how it can lead to conjectures that, even for younger
learners, can be proved or refuted. The real classroom challenge to
me is to create a conjecturing atmosphere where the pupils come up
with ideas of their own to test in the first place. I loved all the
problems we did at the celebration event at Cambridge. It is hard
to make a recommendation but how about starting with:

- Shaping It (Stage 1 and 2)
- or Button Up (Stage 1)
- or Troublesome Dice (Stage 3)
- or Perimeter Expressions (Stage 3)
- or Dicey Decisions (Stage 5)

I also engage in mathematics when someone mentions something
that catches my interest (not unlike the attraction I feel for
particular NRICH problems). This might be because it is based upon
an idea I have not thought about before or, for some very personal
and indefinable reason, it simply sparks my interest. Off I go to
jot and think and jot and think ... or I find a book, or even look
on the internet.

Sometimes the stimulus is a new topic I am about to teach. I
need to refresh my understanding and think about how I might make
sense of it to others. I open a text book and start to read and
then tackle problems in the exercises. If I have met some of the
ideas before I tend to skim and if I am confident I just go for the
last few questions in the exercise. If I get stuck I might re-read
the intro, go to some 'easier' questions or even find a book that
explains it better.

Recently I have been reminding myself about the mathematics of
the simple pendulum - a reminder precipitated by some Stage 5
problems on the NRICH website. I used a text book off my shelf from
my early teaching days with 'old' units. I was not just reminding
myself about the maths but testing my understanding and seeing how
the author of the book went about trying to explain the topic. I
can admit that starting with the last few questions of the chapter
on this occasion proved ambitious - I resorted to re-reading, going
to a modern edition which used international units (not because the
principles were any clearer but just that the, now unfamiliar,
units were a bit of a distraction) and gaining confidence with some
questions that I felt I could do. What a worthwhile skill,
being able to use books and resources to help oneself, which it
would be great if we could encourage in all our
learners.

Last year I started to work through an old pure text book.
On this occasion the motivation was an awareness that
when I taught A-level maths there were places where I massaged the
maths in order to avoid confronting gaps in knowledge, or lack of
rigour in the mathematical arguments supporting particular results
(for example, binomial theorem for negative powers and product of
gradients of two perpendicular lines).

Very recently, my daughter asked me if I could explain a step
in some maths in a paper she was reading. This was more like
research - a combination of recognising the mathematics, reminding
myself of the detail and then trying to apply it to what was in the
paper. The first two I managed, but I still cannot fit what I know
to what the paper says. I think I might not have fully
understood which were variables in the paper and which constants. I
am bugged by this failure and will probably return to it on and off
into the foreseeable future.

All the above I have tackled alone, with varying degrees of
success and frustration, and that real discomfort when you simply
cannot get your head around an argument presented in a paper or
book. The wonderful thing about that morning together in Cambridge
was the search for patterns, the sharing of ideas, the enjoyment of
being stuck but knowing that you were not alone. There were ideas
that popped up that you could grab with both hands and use to help
you move on, not least listening to how others saw things
differently. I love mathematics and learning mathematics. This is
not my only passion, but I cannot imagine a time when I will not
want to do some mathematics for pleasure. Wouldn't it be great if
we were all a little more passionate about the subject we taught
and that our passion was evident and contagious?

... to start every department meeting or maths-focused staff
meeting by doing some mathematics together. You might even consider
a fortnightly challenge? You could use a problem from the NRICH
website and on each occasion a colleague might take on the job of
selecting the neatest/most engaging solution submitted by the rest
of the team. You might even find there are other members of staff,
not in the maths department, who would like to participate.

May I wish you all wonderful and fulfilling mathematical
journeys.